Lidle's Lawyer Says SR20 Controls Were 'Jammed' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.16.24

Airborne-NextGen-09.17.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.18.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-09.19.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.20.24

Thu, Apr 28, 2011

Lidle's Lawyer Says SR20 Controls Were 'Jammed'

Claims That The Pilot 'Bent The Controls' Trying To Fly The Plane

The lawyer representing the family of New York Yankees pitcher Cory Lidle, who along with his instructor was fatally injured when the Cirrus SR20 he had recently purchased and was flying impacted the side of a building on Manhattan's Upper East Side, told a jury in opening statements Wednesday that the plane's controls were "jammed" due to a design defect in the aircraft.


Cirrus SR20 File Photo

Attorney Todd Macaluso said in his opening argument that "There is no pilot error,"which was the finding of the NTSB in its probable cause report. "If you can't control the airplane, you can't be at fault. This airplane was out of control," he asserted.

Lidle and his instructor Tylor Stanger were flying in the Hudson river corridor, and Cirrus contends Lidle started a turn too late, which gave himself no opportunity to complete the maneuver. A story in the New York Post reports that Macaluso said that the SR20 was "spinning out of control" when it impacted the building, and that "the plane lost control even before it made the turn." He said Lidle bent the airplane's side stick in an effort to bring the aircraft back under control. He also said the SR20s airframe parachute would have had malfunctioned given the unusual attitude of the aircraft, and that at 1,000ft AGL, it would have made little difference. If the airplane had been functioning properly, he said, "with an instructor on board, they could have easily navigated this."

Bloomberg News reports that Cirrus' attorneys said the company is "genuinely sorry" that the two men lost their lives in the accident, but maintain that "Cirrus did not cause these deaths, and the airplane did not cause these deaths."

Lidle's widow is seeking $50 million from Cirrus.

(Editors' Note) The NY Post also reports that Mancuso said that the jammed controls were due to a "design flaw after the 'jet' was rushed into production." If true, we'll see how far that body of aviation knowledge takes him in this case.

FMI: www.nysd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.17.24): Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts

Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts Portray the aeronautical data which is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. These charts depict the procedures, incl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.17.24)

“Our industry is approaching a 30-year innovation cycle, and we have less than 25 years to decarbonize aviation. We need to develop new methods to get net zero aerospace tech>[...]

Airborne 09.16.24: Bristell Shooting, EAA v FAA, Boeing Strike!

Also: Girls in Aviation Day, B-29 Doc Heads 4 Chino, C-17 Tail Cone Detaches, Bulgaria Airshow Accident One of two private aircraft that launched from Apatity Airport near Murmansk>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CubCrafters NX Cub-A Stunning Effort To Build The ‘Perfect Cub'

From 2021 (YouTube Version): We Were Blown Away At How Well The Nosewheel Was Adapted To The X Cub Airframe It should not be a secret to any one of you, that with thousands of hour>[...]

Airborne 09.18.24: Boom XB-1 3rd Test, DJI Ban, SubSonex To EAA Museum

Also: Volato Nixed by Honda, New B-21 Bases, A-10 Unit Inactivated, Gogo/Airshare Boom Supersonic announced its demonstrator aircraft XB-1 successfully completed its third test fli>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC