Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Jul 31, 2004

Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth

ATC Expert Backs Opponents To Texas Airport

The Jetport West Airport project proposed for the city of Fulshear (TX) "presents an irreconcilable conflict with several local airports, making it fundamentally unsafe and a hazard to navigable airspace."

So says an aviation consultant hired by the town, in an affidavit filed with the FAA Tuesday. Donald Hensley, a former controller and commercial pilot, believes building an airport when there are already six inside a five-mile radius will cause insurmountable problems throughout the area.

But Rick Asper, who speaks for Florida-based Aviation Professionals Group, says the airport his company wants to build won't cause any problems at all.

"It should be noted that there are literally hundreds of airports that are far closer to equivalent airstrips than these are, and that these airports and airstrips have coexisted for decades without incident," Asper said in an interview with the Katy (TX) Times.

Hensley, however, says there are already enough potential problems in that small area. Quoting FAA rules, he writes in the affidavit, "The traffic pattern airspace associated with an airport proposal may not overlap the traffic pattern of an adjacent airport."

But Asper says the FAA has already made an exception in that area. "Two of the airstrips to which they refer overlap each other, and in some people's definition of air traffic, have coexisted for 30 years without incident," Asper said.

The proximity of the proposed jetport to five other strips isn't Hensley's only concern. He says there are at least two obstructions just south of the 525-acre site pose a "hazard to air navigation."

Again, however, Asper says his company is addressing those obstructions -- and other concerns about the 7,000-foot jetport runway. "We are proposing a control tower. We will at our expense, fully man and operate a control tower. This is actually an increase in airspace safety."

FMI: www.aviation-professionals.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC