Officials: BA Plane, King Air Had Close Call Near Tampa | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Mon, Oct 23, 2006

Officials: BA Plane, King Air Had Close Call Near Tampa

When Is A Near Miss, Not?

Everyone's OK after a British Airways 777 and a privately-flown Beech King Air got a bit too close in the skies around 50 miles north of Tampa, FL earlier this month. The planes did not collide, and the BA pilot did not report a near-miss to the FAA... but six people were injured when the big Boeing suddenly descended 700 feet to avoid the turboprop twin.

The Orlando Sentinel reports on October 10, the British Airways airliner with 175 aboard had just taken off from Tampa to London. As it was climbing to its assigned altitude of 26,000 feet, the Traffic Collision Avoidance System suddenly alerted when the aircraft was at 16,800 feet, said a British Airways spokesman.

The TCAS directed the plane to descend, which the pilots did very quickly... so much so that two passengers and four crew members were sent to the ceiling.

An FAA spokesman said the King Air was still at least 1,400 feet higher than the 777, and its pilot claimed that he was aware of the location of the British Airways jet.

Despite the injures, the British Airways 777 did not officially report the apparent near-miss and its sudden descent, and continued on to England.

Several critics told the Associated Press this incident illustrates the problem with the antiquated air traffic control system in this country, but as yet, it is unclear if the near-miss was actually a close-call, or one pilot's overly enthusiastic cooperation with a TCAS alert.

In any case... since injuries were minor, and no official report was filed, the FAA will not be investigating.

FMI: www.britishairways.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.28.24)

"Clearing this certification hurdle is a major step forward in providing European CJ customers with a solution that not only enhances their aircraft operations but can also extend >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.28.24): Permanent Echo

Permanent Echo Radar signals reflected from fixed objects on the earth's surface; e.g., buildings, towers, terrain. Permanent echoes are distinguished from “ground clutter&rd>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.28.24)

Aero Linx: Vintage Sailplane Association The purpose of the Vintage Sailplane Association (VSA) is to promote the acquisition, restoration and flying of vintage sailplanes by its m>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.21.24: ‘Liberty Lifter’, Cavorite Flies!, Eurodrone

Also: AMA National Fun Fly, Skyfire SF2, Echodyne Gets BVLOS, Av Meteorology Reference General Atomics' run at developing the Liberty Lifter ground effect aircraft has been put to >[...]

Airborne 05.24.24: NPS Kills Rushmore Flyover, VAI v NYC, New Reno Home-Roswell!

Also: Samson Sky, CAF Great Plains Wing, New Cert Standards, Flying Start Day There are, occasionally, blisteringly dunderheaded bits of governmental incompetence to be found with >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC