Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Aug 23, 2017

Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation

Paper Says Delays Caused Key Evidence To Be Lost

The editorial board of the East Bay Times newspaper has written a piece in which they accuse the FAA and Air Canada of dragging their feet in the investigation of an incident July 7 at San Francisco International Airport (KSFO). An Air Canada A320 lined up to land on a taxiway where four aircraft were lined up waiting for takeoff, and initiated a go-around below 60 feet of altitude, according to the NTSB's preliminary report.

But the editorial board says that Air Canada and the FAA have slowed the pace of the investigation, which has led to the cockpit voice recorder data to be erased. They also say that the Canadian pilots were never tested for drugs and alcohol, and conclude that it all points to a "bureaucratic cover-up that conveniently protects the federal agency and the airline involved."

According to the editorial, the FAA only required one controller to be on duty at the time that the incident occurred, and that the agency did not notify the NTSB about the incident until more than 24 hours after it happened. That allowed Air Canada to operate the aircraft three more times before the investigation began, and the subsequent flights caused the Cockpit Voice Recorder to overwrite the recordings made during the incident flight multiple times.

The board says Air Canada refuses to answer questions about the investigation, the FAA will not explain why it took more than a day to report the incident, and the NTSB says that federal rules do not require such notification because there was no actual collision.

The board says that former NTSB chairman Jim Hall told a reporter for the paper that the investigation should have begun immediately, due to the potential for disaster caused by the mistake.

(NTSB image from file)

FMI: Full Editorial

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.03.24)

"We are reaching out to you today on behalf of the Popular Rotorcraft Association because we need your help. We are dangerously close to losing a critical resource that if lost, wi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.03.24): UAS Traffic Management (UTM)

UAS Traffic Management (UTM) The unmanned aircraft traffic management ecosystem that will allow multiple low altitude BVLOS operations and which is separate from, but complementary>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.03.24)

Aero Linx: Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) SAFE is a member-oriented organization of aviation educators fostering professionalism and excellence in aviation through>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC