ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Apr 07, 2004

ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List

Says Innocent Travelers Are Being Harassed

It's no secret that the TSA is keeping a list and checking it twice, hoping to find who's naughty or nice. And as far as the American Civil Liberties Union is concerned, therein lies the rub.

The ACLU Tuesday sued the TSA on behalf of seven airline passengers the civil liberties group says have been wrongly placed on the so-called "do not fly" list.

"Many innocent travelers who pose no safety risk whatsoever are stopped and searched repeatedly," the ACLU said in a statement issued prior to Tuesday's filing.

The TSA actually keeps two lists and, while their existence is no secret, their contents are. One list contains the names of people the TSA says can't fly.

The second list contains the names of "selectees," those who are given that extra special attention during security screening. How does a name get on one of those lists? You generally have to be referred by a law enforcement or intelligence agency.

At this point, no one knows just how to go about getting off such a list. So says David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "There doesn't seem to be any reliable way to resolve the problem that these people continuously confront."

The TSA admits its name-matching technology isn't perfect. Some people with the same names as those on the lists have run into extra screening and outright flight bans, according to Sobel, even though they themselves have done nothing to warrant the extra special attention.

In such cases, the FBI says you should call law enforcement or the Bureau itself to clear up matters. But some passengers say, even after repeated attempts, they still face the same grueling ordeal at the airport whenever they try to fly.

But the ACLU says, if you think it's bad now, wait until CAPPS II is implemented and the number of names on the lists jumps into the hundreds or thousands.

FMI: www.tsa.gov, www.aclu.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC