Analysts: F-35 Development, Testing Costs Underestimated | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sun, Nov 30, 2008

Analysts: F-35 Development, Testing Costs Underestimated

Independent Team Predicts An Extra Two Years... And $15B More

A defense trade publication reports that an independent team of Pentagon cost analysts said that previous estimates of time and money required for development and testing of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II are too conservative.

Based on experience with other aircraft development programs, the independent team concluded the F-35 will likely require two more years and $15 billion more than Pentagon in-house program managers have predicted, according to Inside The Air Force.

A statement from Lockheed, also describing the internal pentagon estimate as "overly conservative," acknowledged "budget challenges" but expressed confidence to "complete the program at a far lower cost than forecast" by the independent team, reports the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

John Young, Defense Undersecretary for Acquisition, told Inside The Air Force the Pentagon's addition of $480 million to the F-35 testing budget for 2010 "is extremely prudent."

Young said Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England have made an optimistic choice, hoping that the predictions of Lockheed and program managers will prove to be more accurate.

If not, the Obama administration will inherit the decision of whether to delay production and shift funds to the development budget or to appropriate money earmarked for other defense projects to the F-35.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.jsf.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC