NATCA Claims Staffing Woes Behind 'Close Call' Near Las Vegas | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report






Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.25.17

Airborne 09.26.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17


AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.25.17

Airborne 09.26.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17

NEW!!! 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview -- YouTube Presentation / Vimeo Presentation

Mon, Oct 08, 2007

NATCA Claims Staffing Woes Behind 'Close Call' Near Las Vegas

Descending Aircraft Comes Within Three Miles Of Bizjet At FL280

Was it truly a "close call"... and why did it happen? The National Air Traffic Controllers Association told ANN Friday of an incident in the skies over Nevada Thursday, in which an aircraft descending through 28,000 feet came within 2.6 miles of a second plane on converging flight paths.

Both aircraft were being vectored for spacing into McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas just after 1300 local time Thursday, during an especially busy time for the airport, according to the controllers union. The two planes -- a Citation 750 and a LearJet 60 -- were under the control of the Los Angeles Air Route Traffic Control Center.

NATCA says the planes would have come even closer... had the pilots not responded to TCAS warnings, and a controller had not vectored the planes away from each other.

The union tells ANN the situation is "an unfortunate example of what happens in an overstressed, overworked, understaffed situation, which happens routinely."

"This is another example of the Federal Aviation Administration trying to do too much with too little," said Los Angeles Center NATCA Facility Representative Garth Koleszar. "A controller returning to the work area had to take action on his own to assist the controller who was yelling for help. Unfortunately, he was too late and the traffic complexity had already reached extreme levels. The controller jumping in to help didn’t even have time to receive a briefing on the sector traffic situations prior to the error. The FAA supervisor had left the work area moments before and had neglected to provide the controller with the needed help.

"This controller was left to work at above the sector volume at extremely complex levels by himself," he said. “Anytime there is sequencing due to high airport traffic demand, a controller’s work load goes up exponentially.”

Aero-News has reported extensively on the contentious state of affairs between NATCA and the FAA, particularly since contract talks broke down between the two sides last year. The FAA imposed its own contract in June 2006, after the agency declared talks to be at an impasse.

With that in mind, is this incident an ominous sign of looming problems... or an attempt by NATCA to attract further attention to its cause? It probably isn't surprising Ian Gregor, Western Region spokesman for the FAA, leans towards the latter.

"This controller error had absolutely nothing to do with staffing," Gregor tells ANN. "Indeed, the facts prove otherwise. The sector in which the error occurred was fully staffed, there was a routine number of aircraft in the sector when the controller made the mistake, and a supervisor was present.

"The simple truth is that even good controllers occasionally make mistakes," he added. "When they do, we have multiple layers of safety in place to protect the traveling public."

Gregor also takes issue with NATCA's claims of short staffing at control centers nationwide.

"We're fully aware that most of the current national controller workforce will retire within the next decade, and we're aggressively hiring new controllers to replace them," he said. "Currently, we have about 14,800 controllers nationwide, compared to about 14,600 a year ago. We met our hiring goal by bringing on board more than 1,700 new controllers during Fiscal Year 2007 (which ended Sept. 30), and we're having no trouble recruiting people for the positions."

NATCA's Koleszar asserts controllers have been forced to work increased traffic volumes, with fewer associates to lend a hand. "This is when mistakes happen," he said. "Sadly, controllers are leaving the FAA at an increasing rate because of the FAA’s treatment of its employees. It will get worse before it gets better."



More News

Airborne 09.22.17: Breitling DC-3, World Aerobatic Championships, CFI Training

Also: Egan PLIMP, Aero-Honesty, Orbital ATK, United Airlines 747, New AIA Boss, Bristow Norway, ABS Celebrates 50th Having departed from Geneva last March, the Breitling DC-3 made >[...]

RFP: ANN Seeking New Site/Facility For Major Studio Upgrade

It's Official: Aggressive Upgrades For New Airborne Programs WILL Require New Digs It's been in development for years, but we're getting to a point where we think we can pull off s>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17: FAA OKs FL Drone Ops, ICAO Registry?, No Pot Drones

Also: FAA Reauthorization, Medical Drone Transport, USMC Quadcopters, Canister Launched UAS, Atlas Dynamics Airborne, primarily based in Jacksonville, FL is starting to recover fro>[...]

AMA Drone Report 09.21.17: AMA Expo West, Parrot Mambo, No Drone Pot Delivery

Also: Drone Injury Study, Cook County-IL, Northeastern Drone Society, Propel Star Wars Drones, GA UAS Integration One of the pinnacle model aviation events of the year is coming up>[...]

AMA Comments On Singer Decision

Dr. Michael Singer’s Victory in A Federal Court Has Serious Legal Potential Rich Hanson, President of the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA), has issued the following stateme>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC