Shuttle Foam Problems Increased With Switch To Environmentally Friendly Foam | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Tue, Aug 02, 2005

Shuttle Foam Problems Increased With Switch To Environmentally Friendly Foam

Discovery Thermal Protection System Damage Appears Minimal

NASA switched to a Freon-free insulating foam for the external fuel tanks starting with the STS-87 flight of the Shuttle Columbia in 1997. This flight received dramatically more damage then previous flights. Subsequent shuttle flights using the new foam continued to result in up to 11 times more damage then previous flights with the original foam.

The switch to the environmentally friendly foam was made as part of a NASA effort to reduce the environmental impact of space flights. EPA regulations banning CFC's including Freon were put in place due to a suspected link to high altitude Ozone layer depletion.

Examination of the extensive inspection photographs of Discovery has found only small damage to the thermal protection system. NASA has admitted that it was simply luck that one piece of foam almost as large as the one blamed for the destruction of Columbia missed the leading edge of Discoveries wing, and has grounded the remainder of the shuttle fleet until a solution is found. If that piece of foam would have fallen off just 30 seconds sooner in the flight it may have hit the shuttle with similar force as the one that doomed Columbia.

A detailed search through the pictures and video taken during Discovery's launch has found a much smaller piece of foam that apparently deflecting off the wing. Other items found during the inspection include a piece of damaged tile on the critical nose wheel door and a piece of gap filler, which insulates between the tiles, which is protruding located slightly farther back on the belly of the shuttle. These areas are being examined in great detail.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Airborne 10.14.25: Laser Threat, VeriJet BK, Duffy Threatens Problem Controllers

Also: USAF Pilots, Atlanta Tower Evac, Archer Spotlight Dissipates, Hop-A-Jet Sues A social-media call for people to point lasers at aircraft flying over Portland’s ICE facil>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.20.25)

“We developed this prototype from concept to reality in under a year. The U-Hawk continues the Black Hawk legacy of being the world’s premier utility aircraft and opens>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.20.25): Flameout Pattern

Flameout Pattern An approach normally conducted by a single-engine military aircraft experiencing loss or anticipating loss of engine power or control. The standard overhead approa>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Schweizer SGS 2-33A

Student Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Airspeed And Altitude Resulting In A Collision With The Ground During The Base To Final Turn Analysis: The solo student pilot reported she>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC