FAA, EASA Issue Emergency AD’s for Helicopters | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Sat, May 14, 2022

FAA, EASA Issue Emergency AD’s for Helicopters

FAA Issues Emergency Airworthiness Directive For Airbus' AS, EC, and MBB Helicopters

Earlier this month, the FAA issued an Emergency Airworthiness Directive, AD 2022-10-51 for specific models of the Airbus AS, EC, and MBB series of helicopters.

This AD is in response to a “supplier report of non-conformity during production”, in particular, the ‘Flexball’ flight control cables which, if not addressed, may result in those controls becoming jammed, and subsequently pilot loss of control. Similarly, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued an emergency AD 2022-0077-E on 29 April 2022 to correct that unsafe condition.

On the topic of cost, the FAA estimates the AD affects just over 1750 helicopters registered in the USA and, using an estimated labor rate of $85, they see a replacement time of 8 hours, with parts costing anywhere from $804 to $13,555 (depending on part number), with an eventual estimated cost of approximately $1500 to $14,000 per helicopter, or $438K to $4million for the US registered fleet. Last but not least, there is a half-hour reporting fee which adds about $43 per helo or $77k for the US registered fleet!

The FAA, in its Emergency AD outlined that the required compliance for US operations applies only to those helicopter models that have been FAA type-certificated and included in the Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS). The FAA stated that while the EASA AD specifies the part be removed and sent to the supplier, the FAA’s AD requires removing the affected part from service. Subsequently, while EASA permits a single ferry flight to the maintenance facility, the FAA is ok with a special flight permit or continuous authorization flight for a single flight provided there is no noticeable increase in friction in the flight controls. In both cases, passengers are not permitted on these flights.

FMI: https://faa.gov/aircraft/safety/alerts

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.30.25): Ground Stop (GS)

Ground Stop (GS) The GS is a process that requires aircraft that meet a specific criteria to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equip>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.30.25)

Aero Linx: Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) improves safety and public confidence in aviation, marine and rail transport thro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.30.25)

“The Palo Alto stopover confirmed—yet again—that flight schools and aero-clubs are no longer just curious about electric training; they are ready to buy. In just >[...]

NTSB Final Report: ICON A5

Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Clearance From The Water While Flying At A Low Altitude Analysis: The flight of two airplanes was in cruise flight on a north heading about 50 ft >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC