Tue, Sep 24, 2002
On
aircraft equipped with Wet Vacuum Pumps, M-20 Oil Separators states
that two of their air/oil separators are better than one.
“Airplanes equipped with wet vacuum pumps are usually 30- to
50-year-old aircraft and are generally well maintained,”
states Bill Sandman, M-20 President.
“Pilots of these aircraft are accustomed to a large
canister-type filter/separator attached to both their engine
breather and their wet vacuum pump exhaust. There is a
growing trend to replace these older combination separators with
two M-20 separators because of increased performance and
efficiency.
But a common question is: Why does it take two
separators to replace one combination unit?”
In clarifying the two-separator M-20 solution, Sandman said,
“The engine breather sees faint pressures ranging from
1” H2O on a new engine to 3” H2O on a run-out
engine. These pressures are too small to be measured in Hg or
PSI—common aviation values—they are just a tad higher
than atmospheric pressure. Vacuum pumps output 4.6”
Hg. That is about 46 times greater than crankcase
pressure—an amount that would kill any engine. Attempts
to co-mingle these two pressure extremes in a single separator
device requires compromise resulting in poor separation performance
for both the breather and the vacuum pump.”
Sandman added, “The two separation tasks differ
greatly. The engine outputs copious amounts of air and water
vapor, plus about one quart-per-hour of aerated oil, all at
extremely low pressure while the wet vacuum pump blasts out a
stream of liquid oil propelled by high pressure air.
M-20’s breather separators instantly divide
the oil from the air-water vapor mix. This returns the oil to
the engine as quickly as the mist can be formed into drops.
At the same time, the gas mix is vented immediately. It is a
quick, non-pressure process. There is no other way to get the job
done proficiently. For the wet vacuum pump, the blast of high
pressure air must vent, but the liquid oil has to be tricked into a
diverging path to the return line so as not to be aerated and
sucked out with the air. Neither of these tasks is
easy—both require precision and an have intolerance to being
set off balance by the other. For these reasons, and to
insure optimum performance, we promote the two-separator
solution.”
More News
How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]
Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]
NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]
Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]
Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]