California Lawmakers Revive Statewide UAV Ban Legislation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jun 01, 2016

California Lawmakers Revive Statewide UAV Ban Legislation

Measure Approved By The State Senate Public Safety Committee

A California legislator has revived her efforts to put some kind of statewide ban on UAVs despite the objections of the industry and many users.

The California State Senate Public Safety Committee last week approved a bill introduced by Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) that would ban the flight of remotely piloted aircraft near airports and "critical infrastructure" in the state. During the hearing, Sen. Jackson said that the state "must develop some kind of approach to addressing this very exciting, but also very dangerous technology," according to a report appearing on the website Techwire.net.

Jackson sponsored similar legislation last year, but it was vetoed by CA Governor Jerry Brown. That law, which did pass the full legislature, would have banned all UAV flights over private property. In vetoing the bill, Brown said that the law would have exposed UAV users to "burdensome litigation and new causes of action."

The measure which passed the committee last week would ban UAV flight within 1000 feet of a heliport or five miles of an airport unless expressly permitted to do so. It would also prevent UAVs from flying within 500 feet of infrastructure such as bridges, power plants, hospitals, water facilities and oil refineries.

Critics say that the FAA has jurisdiction over the national airspace, and should be the rulemaking authority concerning UAVs. But Jackson said that "the FAA doesn't control everything, and the state has its responsibilities."

The law would carry fines of $250 to $1,000 or up to six months in jail.

(Image from file)

FMI: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB868

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-NextGen 11.04.25: Anduril YFQ-44A, Merlin SOI 2, UAV Rulemaking Stalled

Also: Horizon Picks P&W PT6A, Army Buys 3 EagleNXT, First Hybrid-Electric Regional, Army Selects AEVEX Anduril Industries’ YFQ-44A Collaborative Combat Aircraft was flown>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Elmore Travis C Searey

While Flying North Along The Beach At About 300 Ft Above Ground Level, The Pilot Reported That The Engine RPM Dropped To About Idle On September 28, 2025, at 1126 eastern daylight >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.03.25)

Aero Linx: European Association of Aviation Training and Educational Organisations (EATEO) Welcome to the “ European Association of Aviation Training and Education Organizati>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.03.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.03.25)

“It also gives us the hard data we need to shape requirements, reduce risk, and ensure the CCA program delivers combat capability on a pace and scale that keeps us ahead of t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC