NTSB Report on Alaska Flight 261 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Dec 10, 2002

NTSB Report on Alaska Flight 261

Not Enough Grease on Jackscrew

Putting to rest voluminous outside speculation about the cause of the crash of Alaska Airlines Flight 261, the NTSB is expected today to say what's been the popular explanation for nearly three years: not enough grease on the jackscrew caused the failure, which caused loss of control of the aircraft, and the deaths of all 88 aboard.

The flight, from Puerta Vallarta to San Francisco, went down January 30, 2000, off Point Mugu (CA).

Nearly immediately, as the wreckage was recovered (bottom photo), investigators turned to the horizontal stabilizer's jackscrew (right). When it was recovered along with its mating gymbal nut, it showed high friction and stripping, indicative of binding, which is indicative of insufficient lubrication.

Later, the issue of inspection came up, and many heads were put on the block. An inspection of the jackscrew called for replacement of the expensive assembly; four subsequent inspections showed the screw assembly to be in-tolerance, though just barely.

Further sleuthing revealed there had been two types of grease applied, at different times, to that jackscrew.

Both were approved greases; but there was a question of the compatibility of the greases -- could they work with each other, if mixed -- and the verdict was that they could not. Was the removal of the old grease thorough enough, to preclude any incompatibility? Would such incompatibility be sufficient to cause the wear and binding that brought the airliner down?

The NTSB's final report should put ANN's "Story of the Year 2000" to bed, and hopefully, to rest. From here, it's up to the lawyers to keep things so 'profitably' stirred up...

FMI: www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001212X20339&key=1

Advertisement

More News

Airbus Racer Helicopter Demonstrator First Flight Part of Clean Sky 2 Initiative

Airbus Racer Demonstrator Makes Inaugural Flight Airbus Helicopters' ambitious Racer demonstrator has achieved its inaugural flight as part of the Clean Sky 2 initiative, a corners>[...]

Diamond's Electric DA40 Finds Fans at Dübendorf

A little Bit Quieter, Said Testers, But in the End it's Still a DA40 Diamond Aircraft recently completed a little pilot project with Lufthansa Aviation Training, putting a pair of >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.23.24): Line Up And Wait (LUAW)

Line Up And Wait (LUAW) Used by ATC to inform a pilot to taxi onto the departure runway to line up and wait. It is not authorization for takeoff. It is used when takeoff clearance >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Extra Flugzeugbau GMBH EA300/L

Contributing To The Accident Was The Pilot’s Use Of Methamphetamine... Analysis: The pilot departed on a local flight to perform low-altitude maneuvers in a nearby desert val>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'Never Give Up' - Advice From Two of FedEx's Female Captains

From 2015 (YouTube Version): Overcoming Obstacles To Achieve Their Dreams… At EAA AirVenture 2015, FedEx arrived with one of their Airbus freight-hauling aircraft and placed>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC