After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Thu, Oct 20, 2005

After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules

Stronger Seats Designed To Increase Crash Survivability

It's the kind of story for which you might want a fanfare. Something bold and brassy. After all, this has been a long-time coming.

After 17-years, the FAA has finally completed work on its rule requiring stronger passenger seats on commercial flights. The rule will affect aircraft built after 2009.

The seats will have to withstand 16-Gs -- compared to the 9-G requirement currently in effect. Same goes for the cabin floors and the tracks upon which the seats are mounted.

The rule does not require aircraft manufacturers to retrofit aircraft currently in service. That's a tip of the hat to the industry turmoil that broke out after the terrorist attacks of 2001.

Aircraft built since the 1990s already have seats that can withstand 16-Gs.

"It was not worth the minute safety benefit for retrofits," said John Hickey, director of FAA's Aircraft Certification Service, quoted by the Washington Post. "It's the right, sweet-spot solution -- it gives passengers the safety benefit at a very reasonable cost."

Indeed, the Post reports a retrofit solution would have cost the industry $519 million. The current solution will cost approximately $34 million between 2009 and 2034. In that period, the FAA estimates the airline industry will take delivery on 1,752 new aircraft with a total of 225,274 passenger seats.

"From a carrier perspective, this rule makes sense," Basil J. Barimo, vice president of operations and safety for the Air Transport Association, told the Post. "The FAA recognized they had a difficult case to make with retrofit design because a significant number of seats had already been replaced with 16-G compatible seats."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC