UPS Pilots Make Oral Argument Before The D.C. Circuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-

Airborne Unlimited-

AMA Drone Report-

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited--02.24.20

Airborne UnManned--

Airborne Unlimited--02.19.20

AMA Drone Report--02.20.20

Airborne Unlimited--02.21.20


Airborne Unlimited--02.24.20

Airborne UnManned--

Airborne Unlimited--02.19.20

AMA Drone Report--02.20.20

Airborne Unlimited--02.21.20

Wed, Mar 09, 2016

UPS Pilots Make Oral Argument Before The D.C. Circuit

Pilots Union Challenging Cargo Exclusion From Rest Rule

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral argument Monday for the Independent Pilots Association (UPS pilots) in its lawsuit challenging the FAA's decision to exclude all-cargo operators from the new Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements.

"It's taken four years to get our day in court, but UPS pilots are ready to outline our case for one level of aviation safety," said IPA General Counsel William Trent.  "The arguments we will be making before the court ... are: 

The FAA failed to execute Congress' command to promulgate regulations that address the acknowledged problems relating to pilot fatigue in all-cargo operations. Congress directed the FAA to 'issue regulations, based on the best available scientific information, to specify limitations on the hours of flight and duty time allowed for pilots to address problems relating to pilot fatigue,' and

The scientific information on fatigue does not support the FAA's exclusion of all-cargo operators from the final rule. The FAA's decision to leave all-cargo operations subject to the old Part 121 rules also violates the Safety Act because the decision leaves cargo pilots subject to rules that do not reflect the 'best available scientific information' about pilot fatigue, and

The FAA impermissibly relied on a cost-benefit analysis to ignore Congress' directive to utilize scientific information on pilot fatigue.
"Importantly, however, the IPA does not seek to overturn the new Part 117 rules as they relate to passenger operations, but only to have the Court order the FAA to reconsider the inclusion of cargo operations consistent with its mandate from Congress," Trent said.

(Source: IPA news release)

FMI: Final IPA Opening Brief


More News

Counting Down! ANN's Infamous April 1st Edition Is Back--With A Vengeance!

Send Us Your Wacky Ideas NOW! ANN E-I-C Note: Folks... we gotta warn you... our Annual April 1st Editions are LEGENDARY -- and like EVERY YEAR, we intend that this WILL be our best>[...]

AMA Drone Report 02.20.20: Aerobatic Drone, Michigan Ruling, AMA v SecTrans

Also: 19000 NPRM Comments, ABA on Drones, RID Flyer, DJI Releases RID Video A drone capable of carrying a person and performing aerobatics has been built and flown by Drone Champio>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (02.24.20)

"This is an outstanding early result that demonstrates the pace that can be achieved when we bring the best of British capability together. To go from design to flight in less than>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 02.18.20: UAS Symposium, Unmanned Growlers, Bell Transport 70

Also: UAVOS Upgrades, UAV’s Flight Control Solutions, NASA-Collins Aerospace, Black Swift Technologies The FAA and AUVSI will co-host the 5th Annual FAA UAS Symposium on June>[...]

Airborne 02.24.20: New Bell EDAT, Jetman Upgrades, Amateur Rocket Fatality

Also: Artemis Lunar Exploration Program, X-57 Undergoes Tests, Airport Grants, Kuwait v Airbus A bit of a surprise media leak made the ever-innovative folks at Bell Helicopter take>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2020 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC