Federal Judge To Decide If Consumer Drones Are 'Aircraft' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne Unmanned-
Alt. Wednesdays

Airborne Flight Training-Alt. Wednesdays

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne Special Programs!
Airborne-YouTube Airborne Unlimited--10.26.20 Airborne-Unmanned--10.14.20   Airborne-Flight Training--10.21.20 Airborne Unlimited--10.23.20  The 2020 Avionics Innovation Preview!

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited--10.26.20

Airborne-Unmanned--10.14.20

Airborne-Flight Training--10.21.20

Airborne Unlimited--10.23.20

Airborne's Annual April 1st Episode

Sat, Jun 11, 2016

Federal Judge To Decide If Consumer Drones Are 'Aircraft'

Decision Could Have Significant Impact On The UAV Industry

A court case that could have a significant bearing on the FAA's authority to regulate consumer UAVs is playing out in Connecticut largely out of the media glare.

The case stems out of the Pirker decision, in which an NTSB administrative law judge determined that small drones and model aircraft were not subject to FAA regulations. The NTSB appealed that decision, and determined that drones flown by hobbyists are indeed subject to the FAA's prohibition of "careless or reckless operation."

Analyst John Goglia writes in Forbes that the NTSB's decision is not the final word in the matter, and it is not binding in the FAA's case against Austin and Bret Haughwout, a father and son from Connecticut subpoenaed by the FAA for documents related to two videos posted by the pair which went viral. The videos show a modified UAV firing a handgun, and flaming a turkey on a spit. The Haughwouts have declined to submit the subpoenaed documents, or appear for depositions unless ordered to do so by a court.

The FAA brought the case to the Connecticut Attorney General's Office to force the two to comply with its demands.

Goglia said that in a conversation with Mario Cerame, the pro bono attorney assigned by the judge to represent the Haughwouts, Cerame said that the FAA's definition of an "aircraft" is "crazy." Cerame said that taken to its conclusion, the definition could extend from paper airplanes to bullets and flags.

In March, Judge Geffery Meyer told the parties to prepare their arguments concerning the FAA's authority over small UAVs, and oral arguments are scheduled for July 6.

Cerame told Goglia that for the judge to rule in favor of the Haughwouts, he would have to conclude that the FAA's stance is "obviously wrong."

It's a case that is likely being watched closely by the entire commercial UAV industry.

(Image from file)

FMI: Full Article

Advertisement

More News

Klyde Morris (10.26.20)

Klyde Is Aware That Even The Space Program Is Beholden To The Whims Of Cyberspace... FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 10.26.20: Fifth G700, Harrison Ford, Citation CJ Repairs

Also: 1st US-Assembled A220, Sporty's Intro's New LTF Course, Capt. Judy Cameron Scholarship, Loyal Wingman 1st Taxi Gulfstream's fifth G700 flight-test aircraft has taken flight, >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 10.21.20: CAP -- USAF, IMC Club, Online Upset Training

Also: Second Amendment to SFAR 118, West Houston Airport, Space Test Fundamentals, Adversary Training We have a packed episode today filled with the latest news in flight training,>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Airborne 10.23.20: P2010 TDI Cert, OSIRIS-REx, MultiGP Championships

Also: F-22's Intercept Russians, WAI Scholarships, Honeywell-Pipistrel, Dufour Demo's eVTOL TECNAM has received a Type Certificate for the P2010 TDI from EASA. The P2010 TDI certif>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2020 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC