JPL Vs. Intelligent Design In California | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne Unmanned-
Alt. Wednesdays

Airborne Flight Training-Alt. Wednesdays

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne Special Programs!

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited--05.27.20

Airborne-Unmanned--05.28.20

NEW! Airborne-Flight Training--05.20.20

Airborne Unlimited--05.29.20

Airborne's Annual April 1st Episode

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne Unlimited--05.27.20

Airborne-Unmanned--05.28.20

NEW! Airborne-Flight Training--05.20.20

Airborne Unlimited--05.29.20

The 2020 Avionics Innovation Preview!

Wed, Nov 23, 2011

JPL Vs. Intelligent Design In California

Former Employee Says Firing Was Based on Conversations At Work

A Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge ruled November 18 that a jury will decide whether NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) unlawfully discriminated against a former employee for discussing the scientific theory of intelligent design (ID) at work.

According to the Discovery Institute, David Coppedge, a 14-year JPL veteran and team lead computer administrator on the Cassini Mission to Saturn, was demoted for lending ID-related DVDs to coworkers, behavior that one JPL complainant called "harassment," and another branded "pushing religion." After he filed suit to vindicate his free expression rights, JPL terminated Coppedge.

The plaintiff will contend that evidence shows JPL demoted and terminated Coppedge because he expressed a pro-intelligent-design scientific viewpoint disliked at JPL and labeled "religion" by JPL decision-makers.

"The Court's ruling allows a jury to vindicate David Coppedge's rights," said Joshua Youngkin, a legal affairs policy analyst with Discovery Institute. "California law forbids employers who view an employee's expression as religion to punish or diminish the employee on that basis. Although ID is not religion, it can't be singled out by JPL or other employers in this way..."the upcoming JPL trial will remind employers that it is costly to discriminate against ID in the workplace."

In its ruling, the court found there "are triable issues of fact as to whether Plaintiff's demotion, written warning, negative performance evaluations, and ultimate termination were adverse employment actions" which involved discrimination. Coppedge is represented by William J. Becker, Jr. of The Becker Law Firm, who was supported in the case by Alliance Defense Fund.

FMI: www.discovery.org/jpl

Advertisement

More News

NASA and SpaceX Maintain Target For May 30 Demo-2 Launch

NASA Continues to Monitor Weather, Cross Fingers, Keep Rabbit's Foot Close By... NASA and SpaceX continue planning toward a Saturday, May 30, launch attempt of NASA’s SpaceX >[...]

Congo Airways Converts Embraer E175 Order to E190-E2 Jets

Currently 189 Embraer Aircraft Operating In Africa Congo Airways have converted the firm order made in December 2019 for two E175 aircraft, with purchase rights for two more, into >[...]

EAA Advises EPA Against Need for Evaluation or Regulation of Avgas Component

EAA Made Clear That The Public Has Limited To No Exposure To EDB In Concentrated Form EAA recommended the EPA not designate an integral component of avgas, ethylene dibromide (EDB)>[...]

EHang Granted Approval To Use EHang 216 Passenger-Grade Aav For Air Logistics Pu

Trial Air Logistics Services Using the EHang 216 Starting Soon EHang has obtained the world’s first commercial pilot operation approval to use passenger-grade autonomous aeri>[...]

Pulselite Bird Strike Prevention System STC Expanded to Include Bell 429 and 505

Pulselite System Has Been Proven To Significantly Reduce Bird Strikes Precise Flight has expanded its Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) from the FAA for the Pulselite Bird Strike>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2020 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC