E.U. Reverses Plan For Carbon Tax On U.S. Airlines | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-

Airborne Unlimited-

AMA Drone Report-

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 12.04.17

Airborne-Unmanned 12.05.17

Airborne 12.06.17

AMA Drone Report 12.07.17

Airborne 12.08.17


Airborne 12.04.17

Airborne-Unmanned 12.05.17

Airborne 12.06.17

AMA Drone Report 12.07.17

Airborne 12.08.17

Sat, Mar 08, 2014

E.U. Reverses Plan For Carbon Tax On U.S. Airlines

No Enforcement On Non-European Carriers Until At Least 2017

The European Union has reversed its efforts to impose a carbon charge on American air carriers operating flights in and out of Europe through 2017.

EU ETS is a proposed emissions trading program that would levy a tax on U.S. airline carriers’ flights into and out of EU countries. It is related to European countries’ interest in reaching their own internal goals for carbon emissions. The EU program being considered would apply a “cap-and-trade” carbon tax system to all flights originating or landing in Europe—taxing even those emissions that occur over the United States, international waters, and elsewhere outside Europe. Remarkably, these taxes would not be set aside for a specific purpose, and could be used as part of the general fund of any European Union government for virtually any purpose.

The EU announced late last year that it would delay applying the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) to the aviation industry for one year to allow time for an international agreement. This week, the EU extended that delay through at least 2017.

The scheme had been opposed by members of the U.S. Congress, including Democrat Claire McCaskill (MO), who had previously joined with Republican Senator John Thune (SD), successfully passing bipartisan legislation to protect American consumers from the European Union (EU)’s illegal carbon tax on U.S. air travelers. The Senators subsequently urged the Administration to use all tools at their disposal to prevent the EU from moving forward with imposing such a tax.

“It’s a commonsense notion that Americans shouldn’t be forced to pay a European tax when flying in U.S. airspace,” McCaskill said. “It’s refreshing that common sense is prevailing with our European allies.”

In the U.S. House of Representatives, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) (pictured), Full Committee Ranking Member Nick J. Rahall, II (D-WV), Aviation Subcommittee Chairman Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), and Aviation Subcommittee Ranking Member Rick Larsen (D-WA), released a statement on the reversal.
“Aviation is a global industry and we are pleased the EU now appears to be focused on working with the international community rather than unilaterally imposing an emissions tax on other nations' air carriers.”
Last year, the bipartisan leaders of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and Aviation Subcommittee wrote to Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx urging him to protect U.S. aircraft operators from unfairly being subjected to the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) while a global plan to reduce emissions is being developed.
Shuster, Rahall, LoBiondo, and Larsen were also instrumental in the passage of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme Prohibition Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-200), legislation that directs the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit U.S. aircraft operators from participating in the EU’s aviation emissions cap and trade system.  The law also instructs U.S. officials to ensure U.S. aviation operators are not penalized by any unilaterally imposed EU emissions trading schemes.

Reuters reports that the decision is preliminary, and still requires the approval of the European Parliament.

FMI: www.europarl.europa.eu/portal/en


More News

Canada Bails On Super Hornet Deal With Boeing

Will Acquire Jets From Australia Rather Than Purchase New Aircraft, Citing Trade Dispute Boeing's trade dispute with Bombardier has led the Canadian government to cancel its plans >[...]

AMA Drone Report 12.07.17: AMA Supports GoFly, ALPA v UAS, EU Drone Regs

Also: Drones Hunt Pythons, MI State Regs, Thanksgiving Drone Flying, Drone Collision Report A little outside our normal coverage responsibilities, nonetheless, we’re intrigue>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 12.05.17: Mercedes Drone Deliveries, ALPA v UAVs, Tyndall RPAs

Also: ESA Eyes High-Altitude Aerial Platforms, Coptrz Provides UAS, Amazon Patent, UAS Integration In a global first, online orders were delivered in Zurich between September 25 an>[...]

Airborne 12.08.17: AMA Joins GoFly, Mackay Trophy Heroes, KSMO To The Rescue

Also: Orion Parachute Test, Workforce Shortage Issues, Cygnus Departs ISS, Myrtle Beach AirShow AMA has partnered with Boeing to support GoFly, an incentive competition that encour>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.11.17)

“What we turned in was a list of ideas that we had identified as things that might be helpful in terms of regulatory streamlining... Nobody had to twist our arms on this. We&>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC