US Airways Suspends Woody | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-08.18.25

Airborne-NextGen-08.19.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.20.25

Airborne-FltTraining-08.21.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.22.25

Thu, Jan 17, 2002

US Airways Suspends Woody

Elwood 'Woody' Menear Shouldn't be Victim of 'PC Police'

US Airways has let the world know that it has suspended pilot Elwood 'Woody' Menear, 46, after he was charged with two crimes, for a question he asked overzealous screeners last weekend ("US Airways Pilot Made 'Inappropriate' Remarks!" 01-14-02, ANN). 

The airline wouldn't say whether Woody's still drawing a paycheck. 

"Authorities" still won't say what Menear's "inappropriate" question was, though one might ask if "inappropriateness" is now grounds for prison time, since the standards for judging "inappropriateness" vary from one person to another -- and thus aren't "standards," at all.

His preliminary hearing on the PC charges is set for March 8.

Union View Yesterday, Capt. Duane Woerth, president of the Air Line Pilots Association, in response to the arrest in Philadelphia last Sunday, let loose a sensible (as usual...) statement:

The arrest of an airline pilot for making a factual statement about incongruities in our security practices at airports underlines just how much of a strain the Sept. 11 attack has placed on the air transport system and on all Americans.

ALPA strongly supports the increases in security that have occurred since the terrorist attack. Indeed, the reason that we have x-ray machines and metal detectors at airports is because ALPA demanded them after the flurry of hijackings in the early 1970s. Within 24 hours after the Sept. 11 attack, ALPA began aggressive efforts to lead, expedite, or participate in many of the security changes that have been imposed since then.

Having said that, I must report that since Sept. 11, ALPA has received thousands of complaints from pilots regarding inconsistencies or improprieties they have encountered at airport screening points, and about the logic of some of the rules, for example, confiscating nail clippers when the pilot has access to a crash axe in the cockpit.

The issue reached the point where last month we posted on our internal Web site a comprehensive set of guidelines for pilots, explaining the regulations, proper procedures for screeners and pilots, and how pilots should handle problem situations.

There clearly are problems in the system, because it's not just pilots who are complaining. Various news stories have reported complaints from passengers about abuses such as improper touching, excessive zeal and arbitrary treatment at the hands of screeners ("Metal Hip, eh?" 01-09-02, ANN).

Furthermore, pilots sometimes perceive that they are subjected to higher levels of scrutiny than normal, while others such as caterers and cleaning crews have access to their waiting aircraft with virtually no security checks or supervision.

ALPA strongly advises pilots always to comply with instructions at the screening points, but the problems of inconsistency and improper procedures are creating ill will among pilots and need to be addressed. We have been working with federal officials to try to rectify these problems. We anticipate some improvements when the Transportation Security Administration assumes control of airport security on Feb. 17. In the meantime, ALPA will defend the pilot involved in this unfortunate incident to ensure that a proper investigation has been conducted and that the pilot has been afforded appropriate due process in this case.

In closing, I want to highlight one specific proposal that ALPA has been proposing in one form or another since 1987. That is the "Universal Access" ID card system. New ID cards with embedded microchips can store a variety of information that would provide a nearly foolproof way to identify pilots and other airline and airport workers. Anyone bearing this form of ID could be processed through security with a less intense level of scrutiny. That would go a long way toward relieving a principal source of complaints from pilots. This technology can even be applied to the concept of "trusted passenger" lists. Pre-screened passengers bearing these encoded ID cards likewise would undergo less intense scrutiny.

FMI: http://www.alpa.org, http://www.usairway.com, http://www.usairwayspilots.org 

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Profiles in Aviation - Aaron Singer’s Nanchang CJ-6A

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): From China to Wittman Field, Singer Introduces the Nanchang CJ-6A From 1954 until 1958, the Nanchang Aircraft Factory build the Soviet Yak-18 under lic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (08.23.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.23.25)

“Developing UL100E has required an exacting level of precision, both in the VP lab here in Texas and through PAFI’s rigorous testing structure. The PAFI process has bee>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (08.23.25)

Aero Linx: Sun 'n Fun International Fly-in and Expo From its humble beginnings in 1974 as a fly-in for sport aviation enthusiasts, the SUN ‘n FUN Aerospace Expo has grown int>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.24.25)

“This Russian activity in the Alaskan ADIZ occurs regularly and is not seen as a threat.” Source: From an email release from Canadian Armed Forces Capt. Rebecca Garand,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC