Congress Urges NASA To Restart Pilot Safety Survey | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 21, 2007

Congress Urges NASA To Restart Pilot Safety Survey

Agency Still Dealing With Fallout From Withholding Results

Not only should NASA finally get around to publicly releasing the results of a controversial $11.3 million federal air safety survey of pilots, lawmakers said this week, the agency should also consider resuming the survey to detect more potential air safety issues.

As ANN reported, NASA spent nearly four years conducting telephone surveys of some 29,000 commercial and general aviation pilots as part of the National Aviation Operations Monitoring Service, asking them about near misses in the air and on runways and cases in which air traffic controllers changed landing instructions at the last second.

News the agency withheld the results of the survey was reported in October by the Associated Press, which tried unsuccessfully to obtain the survey results under the Freedom of Information Act over a 14-month period.

On October 31, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said the agency would release some results from the study by the end of the year. (That hasn't happened yet -- Ed.)

Language calling for the resumption of the survey was included by Congressional budget writers in the massive omnibus budget bill for government agencies, according to AP. Lawmakers directed NASA to spend some of its $625 million for aeronautics research on studying the results, with an eye towards restarting the survey.

The bill doesn't carry any legal weight, per se... but it does show what Congress thinks of the matter.

A NASA spokesman declined to comment Wednesday. In statements before a Congressional hearing in October, Griffin defended the agency's withholding of the results on the basis the program wasn't managed well, and the results weren't verified.

FMI: www.congress.gov, www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC