NBAA Calls Santa Monica's Rate Structure Out of Line | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-
Tuesday

Airborne Unlimited-
Wednesday

AMA Drone Report-
Thursday

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited-10-15-18

Airborne Unlimited-10-16-18

Airborne Unlimited-10.17.18

Airborne Unlimited-10.18.18

Airborne Unlimited-10.19.18

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne Unlimited-10-15-18

Airborne Unlimited-10-16-18

Airborne Unlimited-10.17.18

Airborne Unlimited-10.18.18

Airborne Unlimited-10.19.18

Tue, Jul 08, 2003

NBAA Calls Santa Monica's Rate Structure Out of Line

A Move to Price Bizjets Out of Business There?

The National Business Aviation Association has filed a formal FAR Part 16 complaint with the FAA asking the Agency to investigate the new landing fee structure at Santa Monica (CA) Municipal Airport (SMO). The fees were adopted by the Santa Monica City Council on June 10, 2003, over the objections of NBAA and other user groups, and they are scheduled to go into effect on August 1, 2003.

"NBAA filed the complaint because we see a disturbing trend of access being compromised at Federally funded airports," said NBAA President Shelley A. Longmuir.

Presently, there are no landing fees for general aviation operations at SMO. Effective August 1, landing fees will be imposed on aircraft with a maximum certificated gross landing weight of 10,000 pounds or more on a sliding scale ranging from $0.29 per thousand pounds for the smallest aircraft to $5.81 per thousand pounds for the largest aircraft. As noted in the complaint, this requirement would result in a fee of $343 per landing for Gulfstream II and Gulfstream III aircraft, and it clearly is intended to force larger business jets off the airport.

Under the FAA’s Part 16 procedures, the City of Santa Monica has approximately three weeks to answer the complaint. Further pleadings will be exchanged over a 20-day period, after which the FAA will decide whether to institute a formal investigation.

Santa Monica engaged in a similar exercise last year when it proposed to ban any aircraft larger or faster than those meeting the FAA’s Airport Reference Code B-II standard, which is roughly 50 percent of jet operations at SMO. After NBAA and other user representatives protested, the FAA instituted a formal investigation. That proposal remains pending by the Santa Monica City Council.

We asked a Board member...

David Kaplan, a Board member, told ANN, "The fees come out of a maintenance assessment; I believe this is common practice, determined by the types of airplanes -- to cover the costs of maintaining the runway -- it's not an 'anti-jet' ordinance. It's a matter of weight and [pavement] maintenance." As to which other airports may have similar fee structures, or just how the numbers were arrived at, Mr. Kaplan didn't have those answers at his fingertips. "It was discussed about a year ago," he told us. "It's just now been written into law, and it's just now going to start." All he could remember, additionally, was that, "This was based on a study by an aviation-paving consulting group." He again assured us it was designed to cover maintenance, not to redirect traffic.

FMI: www.nbaa.org/airports/SMO

Advertisement

More News

Mid-Continent and True Blue Power Present ANN's NBAA 2018 Special Coverage!

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics and True Blue Power Present NBAA 2018 (NBAA Display #2265 ) Ravn Alaska Upgrades DHC-8 Fleet with True Blue Power® High-Performance, Lith>[...]

Expert Help Wanted: Could YOU Be The Next Face Of 'Airborne?'

Aviation's Longest Running Video News Program Is Seeking New Talent For Airborne Expansion ANN is on the hunt for next new face of our Airborne news program series... in order to a>[...]

AMA Drone Report 10.11.18: MultiGP/DRL Join Up, Hurricane Warning, EAA Support

Also: Airspace Authorization Expire?, MOSAIC Proposal, New LAANC Providers, FAA Targets UAS Violators The 2018 MultiGP Drone Racing Championship and 2019 DRL Swatch Tryouts eSports>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 10.09.18: FAA Reauthorized, MQ-9B SkyGuardian, MultiGP/DRL

Also: V-247 Vigilant UAV, ParaZero FAA Waiver, AUVSI'S Trusted Operator, Augusta Drone Company The President of the United States has signed the long-term FAA Reauthorization that >[...]

Airborne 10.18.18: PC-24 Expands Reach, Falcon 8X EFVS, Honda Performance Pkg

Also: NetJets Global 7500, New Tower At KGSO, Dassault FalconConnect, Bent Wing Flight Services The PC-24 is taking hold across the globe... Following the TC issuance last December>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2018 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC