AEA Opposes Elimination Of The Detailed Occupation 'Avionics Technicians' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Aug 11, 2015

AEA Opposes Elimination Of The Detailed Occupation 'Avionics Technicians'

Submits Comments To BLS Saying The Designation Should Be Retained

The AEA has submitted comments to the Bureau of Labor & Statistics, Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee Members, asking for the committee to retain the detailed occupation "49-2091 Avionics Technician." The AEA's comments were in response to a recent proposal by a small group of aviation special interests led by the Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC), which among a list of changes, proposed to eliminate the definition, data and career paths of the Avionics Technician.

The AEA's comments opposed the recent proposal on June 4, 2015, by a group of aviation special interests led by the Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC), which proposed changes to the Standard Occupational Classifications for the aviation industry. The AEA stated in its comments that while there is some logic to the proposal to reinstate some of the changes made during the 1998 SOC Revision regarding the aviation maintenance occupations, the proposed elimination of the detailed occupation "49-2091 Avionics Technicians" is illogical and unsupported.

The Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system is used by federal statistical agencies to classify workers into occupational categories for the purpose of collecting, calculating or disseminating data. All workers are classified into one of 840 detailed occupations according to their occupational definition. For decades, the occupational information provided by the SOC has provided critical information for the aviation occupations that is widely used for career recruiting throughout the industry.
 
The Aircraft Electronics Association, which represents tens of thousands of avionics technicians working under the certification of an FAA Part 145 repair station, opposes the elimination of this valuable and critical occupational data and requested that the current information regarding 49-2091 Avionics Technicians be retained.
 
Revising the SOC is a multi-year process, during which the interagency SOC Policy Committee (SOCPC) will formulate recommendations for revisions that are submitted to OMB for consideration.

For the 2018 revision, the SOCPC began planning in early 2012. On May 22, 2014, OMB published a Federal Register notice announcing review of the 2010 SOC manual for revision in 2018, and soliciting public comment on the proposed revision of the 2010 SOC Classification Principles; the intention to retain the 2010 SOC Coding Guidelines; the intention to retain the 2010 SOC Major Group Structure; the correction, change, or combination of selected 2010 SOC detailed occupations, and inclusion of new detailed occupations.

AEA said in its comments that while the interested party, led by the Aviation Technical Education Council (ATEC), submitted their recommendation a full 12 months following the closing of the comment period, which closed on July 21, 2014, and should therefore be rejected by both the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) as well as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the association is taking an aggressive defense position by also submitting our unsolicited comments in protest to the ATEC recommendation.

The association concurs with the submitters that capturing certification data, as an element of the occupational data, would provide a valuable enhancement to data already collected. However, it is simply unacceptable that ATEC does not recognize the difference between a certificate and an occupation.

FMI: Full Comments

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC