NTSB Prelim Released In Training Incident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne 11.21.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.21.14 **
** Airborne 11.19.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.19.14 **
** Airborne 11.17.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.17.14 **

Tue, Feb 21, 2012

NTSB Prelim Released In Training Incident

Pilot Simulating Power-Off Landing Landed Short, Hit A Hidden Object

Consider this a story that things aren't always what they appear to be. A flight instructor who thought it would be ... instructive ... to allow his BFR candidate to land short of the runway during a simulated power-off landing wound up with a damaged airplane, and probably ego as well. Fortunately, the airplane was the only thing damaged in this incident. Both of the pilots walked away uninjured.

NTSB Identification: WPR12LA087
 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Friday, January 27, 2012 in Chehalis, WA
Aircraft: PIPER PA-28-140, registration: N15791
Injuries: 2 Uninjured.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On January 27, 2012, about 1210 Pacific Standard Time, a Piper PA-28-140, N15791, impacted an object protruding from the terrain when the pilot landed short of the runway at Chehalis Airport, Chehalis, Washington. The commercial pilot, and the certified flight instructor who was giving him a flight review, were not injured, but the airplane, which was owned and operated by the pilot, sustained substantial damage. The 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 flight review, which departed the same airport about 90 minutes prior to the accident, was being operated in visual meteorological conditions. No flight plan had been filed.

According to the pilot, who was acting as pilot-in-command because his previous flight review was still current, he was executing a simulated power-off landing as part of his current flight review. Because he failed to manage his glide profile in a manner that allowed him to extend the airplane's glide all the way to the approach end of the runway, and since he elected not to add engine power, the airplane touched down in a grassy area a little over 300 feet short of the runway threshold. The pilot then continued the landing roll over the grassy area, across the threshold, and onto the paved runway surface. Although neither the pilot nor the instructor realized that the airplane had impacted an object, later, after the pilot had returned to his home base, he noticed a dent protruding upward from the top skin of the stabilator. He therefore looked at the underside of the stabilator, and discovered a punctured/torn area that required replacement of stressed skin in an area greater than six inches across.

Piper Cherokee 140 File Photo

Airport personnel later checked the area off the approach end of the runway, and found a piece of bent over rebar protruding from the terrain just over 300 feet from the runway threshold. Tire tracks in the grass revealed that the airplane's wings had just cleared the rebar and that the main landing gear had contacted the surface about 10 feet past it. The rebar, the top portion of which was painted white, was protruding about a foot and a half above the ground. It had been placed there to mark the location of a portion of a future approach lighting system.

According to the FAA Inspector who went to the scene of the accident, the rebar was located about 100 feet beyond the boundary of the Runway Safety Area at the non-controlled airport. The same inspector reported that the flight instructor stated that he did not suggest to the pilot that he add power because it appeared to him that the grassy area was clear, and because he thought the pilot would learn a good lesson by landing short.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.21.14: AEA's 3Q/14 Report, Fantasy Of Flight, Modernizing The NAS

Also: Holland Wants Gold, FAA Strangling UAVs?, RAF WWII Trainer For Sale, Bf109s Live, Georgia v Aerospace Engineers The Aircraft Electronics Association has released its third-qu>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (11.23.14)

"Reaching this stage that we call ATLO is a critical milestone. This is a very satisfying point of the mission as we transition from many teams working on their individual elements>[...]

ANN FAQ: Getting The Most Out Of ANN's Newsletters

ANN goes through a lot of trouble to make the graphics flashy and cool and an integral part of the story. But let's face it, they're bandwidth-intensive. So here are a couple of th>[...]

Air Force Funds Research On Thermal Management Technology For Fighters

Heat Generated By Electronic Systems A Growing Challenge Managing heat that is generated by electronic subsystems in next-generation aircraft is a vexing challenge for aerospace sy>[...]

Raytheon Successfully Demonstrates Airborne Electronic Attack System

Prototype Test Flights Evaluate Integrated Electronic Warfare Capabilities The U.S. Navy and Raytheon successfully demonstrated an end to end, first of its kind, integrated electro>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC