FAA Empowers Boards in Certification Process | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.06.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.07.24

Tue, Mar 01, 2022

FAA Empowers Boards in Certification Process

Technical Advisory Boards to See Expanded Roles in Establishing Compliance

The FAA has announced progress in their use of independent external safety experts for certification of aircraft. 

The expansion affects Technical Advisory Boards, groups composed of private and public safety experts for certification of commercial, GA, and autonomous aircraft. The changes agument the previous Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act by promoting the establishment of the Advisory Boards earlier in the certification process. Now, different levels of Boards will be specified for differing projects, dependent upon the "project scope and the risks the aircraft could pose when it enters into service." The change is meant to accompany recent reforms to the certification process, like taking some duties out of the hands of manufacturers and giving them to independent experts. Additionally, moving things out of the manufacturer's umbrella enhances the transparency of the process - a needful addition following the issues that came to public awareness in the 737 Max debacle. 

During a Board review, technical specialists, independent of a certification project they review, become familiar with the proposed design or change and how it would meet FAA regulation. Depending on the level of review, their responsibilities could include: Identifying new technologies, designs or design features that could be catastrophic if they failed; determining whether FAA project specialists reviewed all major issues; determining whether similar systems have caused problems on other aircraft; determining whether the proper FAA offices were involved in the certification process; and conducting secondary design reviews, procedure, and training evaluations." As an example, the agency notes the use of Technical Advisory Boards for the 737 Max and the upcoming certification review for the 777X. 

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.06.24)

"To advance autonomous flight systems, our focus remains on automating pilot skills that enhance efficiency but most importantly, prioritize safety at every stage. Progressing thes>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.06.24)

Aero Linx: MC-12W Liberty The MC-12W is a medium-to low-altitude, twin-engine turboprop aircraft. Its primary mission is providing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance sup>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.06.24): Airport Taxi Charts

Airport Taxi Charts Designed to expedite the efficient and safe flow of ground traffic at an airport. These charts are identified by the official airport name; e.g., Ronald Reagan >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Holland Travis E Velocity

Pilot’s Failure To Engage The Turbocharger For Takeoff And His Improper Decision To Continue The Takeoff... Analysis: The owner recently purchased the experimental amateur-bu>[...]

Airborne 05.31.24: 1Q GA Sales, 200th ALTO LSA, Spitfire Grounding

Also: NATA CEO In Legal Dilemma, WestJet Encore Settle, Drone Bill H.R. 8416, USN Jet Trainer GAMA released their 1Q/24 GA Aircraft Shipment and Billing Report -- with mostly mixed>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC