Pilot In Minnesota Fatal Accident Continued VFR Into IFR Conditions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-
Tuesday

Airborne Unlimited-
Wednesday

AMA Drone Report-
Thursday

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 11.20.17

Airborne-Unmanned 11.14.17

Airborne 11.15.17

AMA Drone Report 11.16.17

Airborne 11.17.17

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne 11.20.17

Airborne-Unmanned 11.14.17

Airborne 11.15.17

AMA Drone Report 11.16.17

Airborne 11.17.17

Sat, Dec 29, 2012

Pilot In Minnesota Fatal Accident Continued VFR Into IFR Conditions

NTSB Probable Cause Report Indicates The Plane Broke Apart In Flight

This could be described as the very epitome of an avoidable accident. The NTSB has released its probable cause report from an accident which occurred near Glencoe, MN, March 21st in which a Beechcraft Bonanza went down, resulting in the fatal injury of the three people and three dogs on board.

According to the report, the non-instrument-rated private pilot was conducting the accident flight under visual flight rules without a flight plan. Witnesses in the area reported hearing the airplane flying from east to west but could not see the airplane due to the low clouds and reduced visibility. Subsequently, the witnesses heard a loud crack and then the impact of the airplane with the ground. Based upon witness statements and reported weather conditions near the accident site, the flight encountered instrument meteorological conditions. The distribution of the wreckage was consistent with an in-flight breakup starting with the separation of the left wing followed by the separation of the empennage. All fracture surfaces were consistent with overload failure. An examination of the remaining systems revealed no anomalies. There was no record of the pilot receiving a preflight weather briefing from a recorded source.

The pilot, age 52, held a private pilot certificate with a single engine land rating. He was issued a third class airman medical certificate on October 28, 2011. The certificate contained the limitation “must wear corrective lenses.” At the time of application for his airman medical certificate, the pilot reported a total time of 250 hours, and no flight time within the preceding six months.

The pilot’s family provided the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Investigator-in-Charge two logbooks for review. A third logbook, the pilot’s training logbook was not requested and was retained by the family; 57.5 hours of flight instruction and 41.1 hours of solo flight time were recorded in this logbook. The first logbook covered the time between June 23, 2005, and June 13, 2009. During this time, the pilot logged 117 hours in an Alon A-2A. There were no endorsements recorded in this logbook and no instrument flight hours logged.

The second logbook covered the time between November 10, 2011, and March 11, 2012. During this time, the pilot logged 32.6 hours of flight time, 24.2 of which were logged in the accident airplane. On November 12, 2011, the pilot completed the requirements of a flight review and received a pilot-in-command endorsement for the operations of complex aircraft. The two logbooks did not reflect any instrument training or instrument experience. The pilot did not have an endorsement for operating high performance aircraft.

The accident airplane, a Beech 35 (serial number D1113), was manufactured in 1947. It was registered with the FAA on a standard airworthiness certificate for normal operations.

The wreckage was scattered over 900 feet between two plowed fields divided by a field service road. The northern field was a dormant cornfield and the southern field was a dormant soybean field. Small red paint chips were scattered throughout the entire debris field and along the flight path described by the ground witness.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be the non-instrument-rated pilot’s continued flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in the design limits of the airplane being exceeded and an in-flight breakup.

(Model 35 Bonanza pictured in file photo. Not accident airplane)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Mooney International Delivers First Production Ovation Ultra

Legendary Manufacturer Continues To Reach Major Milestones In The Industry With a pair of signatures, a nice round of applause, and the handing over of a shiny new set of keys, Moo>[...]

FAA Approves Drone To Restore Puerto Rico Cell Service

AT&T Flying COW Authorized For The Mission The FAA quickly approved the first unmanned aircraft operation of its kind to help restore cellular service in Puerto Rico in the wak>[...]

Boeing, Avolon Finalize Deal For 75 737 MAX Airplanes

Agreement Includes Firm Orders For 55 MAX 8s, 20 MAX 10s And Options For 20 MAX 8s Boeing and international leasing company Avolon have finalized an order for 75 737 MAX airplanes.>[...]

ALPA Commends DOT 'Forces To Flyers' Initiative

Seen As Way To Increase Piloting Opportunities For Veterans ALPA has welcomed the announcement of the "Forces to Flyers" program aimed at increasing career opportunities for vetera>[...]

NASA Launches NOAA Weather Satellite Aboard United Launch Alliance Rocket

Spacecraft Will Lead To Improve Forecasts, NOAA Says NASA has successfully launched for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) the first in a series of four hig>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC