False Drone Arrest Results In Costly Payout | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jun 22, 2020

False Drone Arrest Results In Costly Payout

False Gatwick Drone Frenzy Results In Cops Having To Pay Those Falsely Targeted

The last year or so was a tough year for the drone biz... as regulators went overboard with ideas about how to keep drones from ramming Grandma's airliner as well as keeping them from peeping through their daughter's windows. The paranoia was tough to deal with, and did a fair amount of damage to the industry, which is fighting for respectability and a fair shake.

Well... it just got a long over-due one. But just one, mind you

In late 2018, during the height of paranoia over unproven drone sightings near Gatwick Airport, which shut things down for days, Sussex's finest carried out an assault with at least a dozen officers on the home of Paul and Elaine Gait -- holding them for 36 hours. No drones were found and they were reportedly working and accounted for at the time of the alleged incidents.

Eventually; the two were released -- without charge --  whereupon the innocent pair sued the Sussex PD for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment.

Now, it appears that there has been a resolution to the matter and Sussex PD will have to dig deep into their piggybank -- to the tune of some 200,000 pounds for the settlement amount and all the associated legal fees.

Sussex Police issued a statement in response to media reports about the compensation paid to the Gaits:

“Sussex Police has paid £55,000 in a joint settlement to a couple arrested during a drone incident at Gatwick in 2018. The settlement was made on a no liability basis, avoiding lengthy court proceedings. We remain in discussion in relation to their request for legal costs.

“All parties agreed that the allegations of unlawful arrest and detention were matters that could only be settled through the courts.

“However, we recognize that things could have been done differently and have apologized to them for the impact of their experience.”

Though no one was charged, nearly 100 people were investigated in the case. The investigation reportedly cost the public some £790,000, though no arrests stuck.

FMI: https://www.sussex.police.uk/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC