A Few Thoughts About The Escalating Fees For Aviation Events | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-
Tuesday

Airborne Unlimited-
Wednesday

AMA Drone Report-
Thursday

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited-05.20.19

Airborne UnManned-05.21.19

Airborne Unlimited-05.22.19

AMA Drone Report-05.23.19

Airborne Unlimited-05.17.19

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne Unlimited-05.20.19

Airborne UnManned-05.21.19

Airborne Unlimited-05.22.19

AMA Drone Report-05.23.19

Airborne Unlimited-05.17.19

ANN's AEA 2019 LIVE Coverage Archive: www.airborne-live.net -- Don't Miss It!

Tue, Jan 24, 2012

A Few Thoughts About The Escalating Fees For Aviation Events

Some Exhibitors At Sebring Light Sport Expo Saw Some Hefty Price Hikes

By David Juwel

Vendors attend fly-in’s because they offer an opportunity to reach large numbers of people that might become potential customers. However, one problem vendors have is the escalating greed of the event organizers. Every year event organizers either raise prices, or they find more places to attach fees, or both. It finally reaches a point where the vendor no longer realizes a profitable return due to the exorbitant expense of exhibiting, so they abandon that particular event.

This is one of the reasons why the Sebring US Sport Aviation Expo was created. Vendors wanted a place to reach out to the public at a fair price, and it worked for several years. But this year, reportedly, things changed. In some cases, prices were raised dramatically. To exhibit in the prime area of the entry gate, according to some reports and positions, the price went from hundreds of dollars to thousands of dollars. Other prices were reportedly raised too.

As I talked with various vendors at the Expo this year, I enquired about how the event was going for them. What I heard was (in part) the following:

  • A displeasure in the price increases.
  • Increased expenses with less benefit.
  • Where the earlier organizers maintained a strong relationship and provided good customer service to the vendors, the new event organizers pretty much ignored them.
  • Promises made by the organizers were unfulfilled.
  • The early vendors who got the show off the ground and helped to establish the event were not shown the respect they deserve.
  • Some vendors see the handwriting on the wall and they’re already discussing whether they will return or not -- some of these, if absent, will be VERY noticeable.

But frankly, these problems are inevitable because each Aviation Event is an organized business that, like any business, continues to seek ways to become more profitable. Unfortunately, there comes a tipping point where the vendor and the public start being gouged. That’s when vendors start dropping out. But this doesn’t stop the gouging because the event organizers simply raise the prices even more to offset the loss of revenue by those who have dropped out.

In my opinion, the following is a perfect example: Every fly-in has a certain amount of space available and each vendor pays a fee to exhibit in some portion of that space. Once the vendors have paid for all the spaces, the fly-in should have met its expenses and achieved a profit. But then the event organizers charge the public $5 for parking, and $10 or more per person (in some cases, MUCH more... like Lakeland) to attend. But the general public receives nothing for that fee. They might get to watch an airshow that is flown for free by the pilots, or they might get to watch some demonstration flights that are funded by the vendors. The public gets to look at the exhibits that are provided and paid for by the vendors. Anything the public buys is a retail product of the vendors. Do you see what I’m saying? The vendors support and fund the whole show. The vendors foot the bill for everything in the show. Everything is paid for. Even the people that work the show are volunteers, so that’s not an added expense. So why do the organizers of these events charge the public an additional fee, if not to increase the bottom line.

These events either need to charge the vendors less money, and let the general public share in the cost of the event, or they need to charge the vendors a fair fee and let the public in for free. The advantage of the latter is you’ll have more people attending, which give the vendors more public exposure, which is the whole purpose of the show!

Bottom-line thinking also shows up in the way event organizers apportion their fees. They tell the vendors that they’re going to put on an event that provides the vendor with the opportunity to make contact with 150,000 people (or more), and they charge them in accordance with those attendance figures. But what is the reality here?  If the event has numerous entry points, numerous corridors throughout the event area, and hundreds of booths, what is the possibility that a vendor will have the number of people pass his booth that his event fee suggests will be in attendance? And don’t forget that all attendance numbers are already misleading because they include the number of each person in a family.

When the fly-in prices start rising, each vendor needs to evaluate the return on their dollar. If you pay $5,000 for an event, plus another $3,000 in promotion materials, and another $2,000 for staff transportation, food and hotels, is it likely that you’ll achieve a profitable return on that investment as a result of attending the fly-in? How many free rides could you have given for that $10,000? How many DVD’s could you have mailed out?  How many follow-up calls, e-mails and brochures could you have provided? And each of these is an actual contact, not a “wandering stroll” past your booth by people that may not even give you a second look or have any interest in your particular aspect of aviation. The vendors ROI for attending an event needs to be closely evaluated.

The event organizers will argue that they’ll get the people into the event, whether you make tangible contact with them or not is your responsibility, not theirs. While that is true in essence, it’s not true in reality because the numbers of people attending the event are not guaranteed to walk past your booth. Public display of your aircraft or product is only valuable to you whenever it results in a tangible relationship with the consumer. What value is it to you if you pay a fly-in fee and don’t get the numbers you paid for passing your booth?

The only way you can fill your sales pipeline and keep it filled is constant and tangible contact with people who are interested. Therefore, the only thing that makes money for you at a fly-in is exposure that results in a tangible contact so that you can follow-up after the show. That’s why it’s essential that you get the numbers promised to you.

The event organizers will also argue that a lot of planes are sold at their events so your expense is always worthwhile. What they don’t tell you, however, is that most of those sales were due to the pre-event activities of the vendor. The event simply gave the prospect a place to meet with the vendor to try the aircraft and culminate the sale. The vendor produced the sale at the event; the event didn’t produce the sale for the vendor. What is the solution?  Maybe if fewer and fewer vendors attended the fly-in’s, someone would wake up and realize that the profitability of the vendors should be the main focus of the event, not the profitability of the event itself. Event organizers should be doing everything they possibly can to increase your success at the event, not otherwise.

Perhaps the vendors need to form an association that puts on minor fly-in events in regional airports around the country. Sort of like a traveling aviation carnival or a national tour made up of aviation vendors. Fix the prices. Every company pays their own expenses. Leasing the airport space is subdivided among the vendors according to the amount of space they require. Let the public attend for free because a free event would give you greater public attendance. Give rides and flying demonstrations. This eliminates the rising, or exorbitant, fees. You would have more tangible contact with the aviation-interested public. It would be beneficial to your local dealers or for starting dealerships. It would be beneficial income to small regional airports. The vendors could travel in RV’s, thus saving food and hotel expenses. The planes can be flown in. The promotional materials and retail products can be trailered in. The success is in the fact that you’re each focusing on making your company profitable, not the event. Your whole focus is on moving your products and filling your sales pipeline. This idea isn’t original with me. It was tried recently by a small group of LSA dealers, and I heard that they were successful doing it. It might be worth considering.

Another solution is to pre-sell your product and make personal appointments at the fly-in with the pre-sold clients. Then when you attend the fly-in, purchase the least expensive exhibit area, dress it up, turn the booth into a private meeting area where you can do a one-on-one by appointment. Coordinate the appointment so that they can sit in the aircraft, fly it, and then do the financials in your private booth area. This will help minimize your fly-in expenses because you won’t require a big staff or exhibit space. Some companies use their RV as a private meeting area.

And finally, the ultimate solution (and of last resort) is to stop attending the major fly-in’s -- or at least cut down on the most cost-prohibitive (and based on what we here, Sun 'n Fun is the one most likely to be cut this year). There are numerous ways to sell an aircraft or aviation product without having to attend the major fly-in’s. The key is to spend your money on what works, not on what is convenient.

Whatever you do, don’t just sit there and be victimized by fly-in excesses. Take whatever action best suits your corporate needs to overcome it.

FMI: www.sport-aviation-expo.com, Comments/Criticism On Escalating Fly-In Fees????

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.20.19: Icon Layoffs, Perlan Mission II, Lilium Air Taxi

Also: #HonorTheWASP, NASA Funds Research, Boom Supersonic And Dassault, New FlightSafety CEO Amid recent reports of yet another sinking of an Icon A5 airframe, a heretofore unsucce>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 05.14.19: Unlawful Drone Demo?, UAS Detection, Schiebel Wins

Also: UK Considers Drone Fee, Drone Finds Radioactivity, 500th Student Trained, Delair UX11 UAV Questions have arisen over the use of anti-drone jamming technology during the recen>[...]

Airborne 05.20.19: Icon Layoffs, Perlan Mission II, Lilium Air Taxi

Also: #HonorTheWASP, NASA Funds Research, Boom Supersonic And Dassault, New FlightSafety CEO Amid recent reports of yet another sinking of an Icon A5 airframe, a heretofore unsucce>[...]

AMA Drone Report 05.16.19: FAA Memorandum, Spark 2?, Illegal Anti-Drone Ops?

Also: FAA UAS Symposium, Alpha Electro, Osmo Action Camera, Hummingbird Robot The net has been awash with copies of a memorandum that may foretell the future of the UAS community. >[...]

ANN Social Media Program (ANN-SMP) Expanded For Oshkosh 2019!

ANN Keeps Pushing Aviation Media (Kicking and Screaming) Further Into The 21st Century... ANN is, again, radically updating its social media campaign for the upcoming 2019 Oshkosh >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2019 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC