FAA Proposes $585,725 Civil Penalty Against Corporate Air | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.16.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.17.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.11.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.12.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.06.25

Fri, Feb 18, 2011

FAA Proposes $585,725 Civil Penalty Against Corporate Air

Alleges Company Operated An Aircraft Without Proper Maintenance

The FAA is proposing a $585,725 civil penalty against Corporate Air of Billings, MT, for allegedly operating a Shorts SD-3-30 twin-turboprop cargo aircraft when it was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.


Shorts SD-3 File Photo

The FAA alleges Corporate Air failed to maintain the aircraft under the company's general maintenance manual, which requires daily post-flight inspections that include examining the exterior skin for corrosion. In addition, the maintenance manual requires structural inspections on the basis of flight hours or flights.

The FAA alleges that Corporate Air operated the aircraft in violation of regulations on at least 81 revenue flights between Dec. 21, 2009 and Feb. 4, 2010 with corrosion that had not been detected during the post-flight inspections. The FAA also alleges that structural inspections were not conducted at the required intervals, between March 16, 2006 and February 3, 2010, in violation of federal regulations.

Corporate Air operates charter and air taxi service under Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations and makes daily feeder cargo flights under contract to a major next-day air package airline.

"Keeping aircraft well-maintained and in good condition must be a top priority for any operator," said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt.  "All operators must comply with maintenance requirements."

Corporate Air has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA's enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.18.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Flying The Legends - Propel's Great Flying Star Wars Drones

From 2017 (YouTube Edition): Fun and Fantasy through Drone Technology… Drones come in all shapes and sizes, and we’re finding out that their design purpose is almost l>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.17.25): Braking Action Advisories

Braking Action Advisories When tower controllers receive runway braking action reports which include the terms “medium," “poor," or “nil," or whenever weather con>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.17.25)

Aero Linx: Orbis Orbis is an international nonprofit that builds strong and sustainable eye care systems globally that put treatment and prevention within reach. We believe in a wo>[...]

Airborne 06.11.25: HPN Access Suit, Air Race Classic!, Cockatoo v Rocket

Also: TN Skydiving Accident, MD Helicopters, Supersonic Flight Welcomed, More Flightdeck Security Private Jet Services (PJS) recently filed a lawsuit against Westchester County and>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC