NASA: Stardust To Return Mid-January 2006 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.23.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.25.25

Wed, Dec 21, 2005

NASA: Stardust To Return Mid-January 2006

And Yes, The Gravity Sensors Are Installed Correctly

NASA is expected to announce Wednesday all systems are go for next month's expected return of the Stardust space probe. Scientists are also confident the ending will go much better than the last time the agency tried something like this.

The probe, which flew through the tail of the Wild 2 comet last year to collect samples of its microscopic debris, will come down somewhere in the Utah desert.

"We feel very comfortable that we don't have any errors like the reversed (gravity) sensor for Genesis," said Thomas Duxbury, project manager for NASA's Stardust mission, to the Salt Lake Herald-Tribune.

Duxbury refers to the agency's first effort to bring back samples of comet debris, the Genesis probe -- which impaled itself into the Utah desert at over 200 mph after its parachute (which was only intended to slow the spacecraft enough so that helicopter crews could snag the probe from the air) failed to deploy. The incident (below) was later blamed on gravity sensors that had been installed backwards.

There are several factors that give the agency confidence Stardust -- which is designed to parachute directly to the ground, touching down at about 25 mph -- will fare better.

For starters, the probe's particle collection plates are much sturdier than those in Genesis; the reason such an elaborate landing scenario was needed for the earlier probe was the delicate nature of those panels. And NASA assures everything on Stardust has been checked and rechecked, with a thorough review process undertaken during the mission, with no warning signs at all.

"There were no smoking guns. Everything was designed and implemented and tested correctly," Duxbury said.

Of course, it's likely Genesis gave no clues of its... well, suicidal... intentions to NASA, either. However, scientists can also take heart that scientists were able to salvage much of the material collected from Genesis following its accident.

FMI: www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stardust/news/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.26.25): Downburst

Downburst A strong downdraft which induces an outburst of damaging winds on or near the ground. Damaging winds, either straight or curved, are highly divergent. The sizes of downbu>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.26.25)

Aero Linx: Air Charter Safety Foundation (ACSF) The Air Charter Safety Foundation is a 501c3 non-profit organization. Founded in 2008, our mission is to lead and support the advanc>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Bizarre Universe of Klyde Morris Cartoons

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Putting the ANT in Antihero A Beech Starship speeds along at altitude. “Deflectors on!” a voice from within the aircraft cries. “Look>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.27.25): Estimated (EST)

Estimated (EST) -When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.27.25)

Aero Linx: Regional Airline Association (RAA) Regional airlines provide critical links connecting communities throughout North America to the national and international air transpo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC