Senate Defense Appropriation Omits F136 Engine | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 08, 2009

Senate Defense Appropriation Omits F136 Engine

President Had Threatened To Veto Spending Plan If Alternate Engine Was Included

The $636.3 billion fiscal 2010 military appropriations bill approved by the U.S. Senate Tuesday does not include funding for the F136 alternate engine for the Joint Strike Fighter program. The alternate engine has been the focus of a presidential veto threat through the entire budget process.

The bill also zeroed out funding for the VH-71 replacement presidential helicopter, which had also drawn a veto threat. That program will possibly start over from scratch.

The Senate passed the bill Tuesday 93-7, which sets up a potentially contentious conference with House negotiators. The House defense appropriations bill includes money for both programs.

Bloomberg News reports that the authorization bill already in conference, which actually tells the military how much it can spend on the various programs, includes money for the JSF alternate engine. Conferees Tuesday agreed to allocate $560 million to fund an alternative engine for the F-35 fighter jet, sources close to the talks said.

But the appropriations bill is the mechanism that actually makes money available.

The House and Senate each appropriated money for additional C-17 cargo planes, thought the Senate bill would fund seven more than the house measure. The Senate rebuffed Senator John McCain, who offered amendments to spend that money on equipment and maintenance, and then simply to cut C-17 funding.

The Senate bill adds up to $3.9 billion less than President Obama had requested in his budget, and includes $128.2 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

FMI: www.senate.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC