Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Fri, Aug 04, 2006

Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues

Says P&W, Skydiving Company, Airport Responsible For Daughter's Death

The National Transportation Safety Board has yet to issue its preliminary report on last Saturday's accident involving a skydiving plane near Sullivan, MO... but that doesn't mean the lawyers are waiting to assign blame.

The parents of Victoria Delacroix, 22 -- who perished in the accident, along with five others -- filed a lawsuit Thursday claiming negligence led one of the DeHavilland DHC-6's engines to fail, leading to the accident.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports Vivian and Susan Delacroix of Kent, England, are suing engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney; Quantum Leap Skydiving Center; Adventure Aviation, owner of the accident aircraft; and Sullivan Regional Airport, which serviced the plane -- saying all are responsible for the death of their daughter.

"Our initial investigation points to a right engine failure just after takeoff," said Gary C. Robb, a Kansas City attorney representing the family. Witnesses say the plane's right engine burst into flames moments after the plane took off, Robb added.

As Aero-News reported, the DHC-6 went down in a residential area shortly after takeoff from the airport on a planned skydiving mission. There were only two survivors of the accident.

Calls by the Post-Dispatch to Quantum Leap and the city of Sullivan -- which owns the airport -- were not returned. A spokesperson with Pratt & Whitney also declined to comment, stating it corporate policy not to discuss incidents still under investigation.

Robb, apparently, does not share that sentiment.

"There were some of the most experienced skydivers in the world on that plane, and not even they could jump from that altitude," Robb said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.19.25: Kolb v Tornados, Philippine Mars, Blackhawk Antler Theft

Also: Tentative AirVenture Airshow Lineup, Supersonic Flight Regs, Private Pilot Oral Exam Guide, Boeing Deal The sport aircraft business can be a tough one... especially when Moth>[...]

Airborne 05.23.25: Global 8000, Qatar B747 Accepted, Aviation Merit Badge

Also: Virtual FLRAA Prototype, IFR-Capable Autonomous A/C, NS-32 Crew, Golden Dome Missile Defense Bombardier announced that the first production Global 8000 successfully completed>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.23.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.23.25)

“While we are relieved that no one was injured, the destruction of our aircraft will have severe consequences on our operations, and it is a personal blow to our dedicated te>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.23.25)

Aero Linx: Ercoupe Owners Club We fly an airplane that was the peak of pre-World War II development. It took more than a decade and a half before the features of the Ercoupe were t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC