CSAR-X Officially Out For Rebid | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, May 16, 2007

CSAR-X Officially Out For Rebid

Contract To Be Re-Awarded In the Fall

The US Air Force released draft requests for bids Monday to three companies battling to win a disputed $15 billion helicopter contract originally awarded to Boeing Co.

The USAF revised its bid, after receiving a non-binding Government Accountability Office recommendation February 26 to re-evaluate operation and support costs sections for a contract to replace 141 Sikorsky helicopters.

As ANN reported, the GAO recommended the Air Force reopen bidding on the deal -- which was awarded to Boeing in November 2006 -- in February, following protests from rival bidders Lockheed Martin and Sikorsky. On March 22, Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne told a Senate committee the USAF would not reopen bidding.

Wynne did agree to hear further arguments from both parties, however, and abide by GAO recommendations on those protests.

Ever the government watchdog, the GAO backed protests from Lockheed Martin Corp. and United Technologies Corp. when they originally lost out to Boeing.

The agency agreed the USAF's evaluation of the bids was "inconsistent" with what had been asked for, according to the Associated Press. The GAO tossed out other protests, however, due to lack of supporting evidence.

For its part, Boeing -- which had offered a search-and-rescue variant of its HH-47 Chinook twin rotor helo for the CSAR-X deal -- said it would not protest or appeal the Air Force decision to reopen bidding... and at least one analyst believes things will still work out for the Chicago-based defense contractor in the end.

"This is positive for Boeing," said Cowen & Co. analyst Cai Von Rumohr. "Any justification to limit protest grounds to one issue makes it easier for the service. The GAO legitimized the rest of the decision by throwing out the other grounds." (Bloomberg notes Cowen & Co. holds shares in Boeing, and United Technologies.)

Sikorsky has proposed its HH-92 Super Hawk for the CSAR-X role; Lockheed is pitching a variant of the three-engined US101 helicopter.

The contract will be awarded this fall, according to the USAF, and Boeing, Lockheed Martin and UTX are expected to submit revised bids in early June.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.gao.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC