NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’ | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’

Had Captured Video Of New Zealand’s Anzac Day Celebration At The Request Of The City Council

UAV operator Robert Edwards got caught up in a regulatory change that resulted in $3,000 in fines levied by the New Zealand government for flying his aircraft over the Anzac Day centenary commemoration in Palmerston North in New Zealand.

Edwards had been contracted to take some photos using his UAV by the city council of the celebration. But a change in the rules that went into effect August 1 requires UAV operators to get the permission of a landowner and the air traffic control unit overseeing the airspace of an intended flight. Palmerston North is under the jurisdiction of the Palmerston North Airport tower.

sUAS News relays a report from stuff.co.nz that there was a complaint to the New Zealand CAA, and he was hit with fines of $2,000 for operating a “model aircraft” in controlled airspace without permission, and $1,000 for operating his aircraft “at night,”

“Yes, OK, I broke the rules. I didn’t mean to,” Edwards said.

The City Council distanced itself from Edwards. Council chief executive Paddy Clifford said Edwards had been contracted to take the photos, but “it is our understanding that Mr.Edwards, ad the pilot and operator, was responsible for complying with the CAA guidelines and rules covering the use of the drone.”

Edwards had reportedly asked for some support from the council to help with his case with the CAA. A spokeswoman for the agency said that the fines are fixed, and there is no flexibility in what is imposed.

Edwards said the fines were “excessive.” Since being fined, Edwards said he’s done “four or five jobs … I have done everything right.”

(Image from file)

FMI:  www.caa.govt.nz/rpas/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC