ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.16.24

Airborne-NextGen-09.17.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.18.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-09.19.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.20.24

Wed, Apr 07, 2004

ACLU Sues Feds Over No-Fly List

Says Innocent Travelers Are Being Harassed

It's no secret that the TSA is keeping a list and checking it twice, hoping to find who's naughty or nice. And as far as the American Civil Liberties Union is concerned, therein lies the rub.

The ACLU Tuesday sued the TSA on behalf of seven airline passengers the civil liberties group says have been wrongly placed on the so-called "do not fly" list.

"Many innocent travelers who pose no safety risk whatsoever are stopped and searched repeatedly," the ACLU said in a statement issued prior to Tuesday's filing.

The TSA actually keeps two lists and, while their existence is no secret, their contents are. One list contains the names of people the TSA says can't fly.

The second list contains the names of "selectees," those who are given that extra special attention during security screening. How does a name get on one of those lists? You generally have to be referred by a law enforcement or intelligence agency.

At this point, no one knows just how to go about getting off such a list. So says David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "There doesn't seem to be any reliable way to resolve the problem that these people continuously confront."

The TSA admits its name-matching technology isn't perfect. Some people with the same names as those on the lists have run into extra screening and outright flight bans, according to Sobel, even though they themselves have done nothing to warrant the extra special attention.

In such cases, the FBI says you should call law enforcement or the Bureau itself to clear up matters. But some passengers say, even after repeated attempts, they still face the same grueling ordeal at the airport whenever they try to fly.

But the ACLU says, if you think it's bad now, wait until CAPPS II is implemented and the number of names on the lists jumps into the hundreds or thousands.

FMI: www.tsa.gov, www.aclu.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.17.24): Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts

Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts Portray the aeronautical data which is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. These charts depict the procedures, incl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.17.24)

“Our industry is approaching a 30-year innovation cycle, and we have less than 25 years to decarbonize aviation. We need to develop new methods to get net zero aerospace tech>[...]

Airborne 09.16.24: Bristell Shooting, EAA v FAA, Boeing Strike!

Also: Girls in Aviation Day, B-29 Doc Heads 4 Chino, C-17 Tail Cone Detaches, Bulgaria Airshow Accident One of two private aircraft that launched from Apatity Airport near Murmansk>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CubCrafters NX Cub-A Stunning Effort To Build The ‘Perfect Cub'

From 2021 (YouTube Version): We Were Blown Away At How Well The Nosewheel Was Adapted To The X Cub Airframe It should not be a secret to any one of you, that with thousands of hour>[...]

Airborne 09.18.24: Boom XB-1 3rd Test, DJI Ban, SubSonex To EAA Museum

Also: Volato Nixed by Honda, New B-21 Bases, A-10 Unit Inactivated, Gogo/Airshare Boom Supersonic announced its demonstrator aircraft XB-1 successfully completed its third test fli>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC