NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.03.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.04.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.05.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.06.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Thu, Apr 01, 2010

NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners

Wants To Be Sure Pilots Are Paying Attention, Not Distracted

ANN April 1st Special Edition: The NTSB has issued a recommendation to the FAA that it require all commercial airliners be equipped with "seat shockers" for the pilot and co-pilot to avoid another "distracted pilot" incident.

After Northwest Flight 188 overflew its destination by 150 miles last October, the flight crew said they were "distracted" by a discussion of airline policy while looking at their laptop computers. NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman said the FAA should require that all commercial airliners be equipped with a device slaved to the airplane's FMS that will give pilots a slight, but noticeable jolt through the seat as they approach their destination.

"We're not sure how that's supposed to be done, but we're sure it will increase safety," Hersman said. She said pilots could avoid the jolt by pressing a button on the instrument panel every half hour during flight.

The board also recommended that ATC should have the ability to activate the system for any aircraft that they are unable to contact for an extended period of time. "It should work through the transponder code," Hersman (pictured) said. "If the pilots don't respond to the radio, then a controller should be able to wake them up."

Pilots unions immediately reacted to the recommendation by saying the NTSB had no right to impugn their professionalism. "Our pilots don't deserve a kick in the pants no matter what the circumstances," said a spokesperson for one union not authorized to speak to the media. While questioning the logistics of such a system, NATCA members privately said (with a bit of a gleam in their eye) they would welcome the ability to get a pilot's attention.

Both Boeing and Airbus said such a system could add tens of thousands to dollars to the cost of new airplanes, and retrofits would be difficult. And, of course, the system would have to be shut off during takeoff and landing to prevent interference with the airplane's navigation equipment.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.05.24: Yakstars Midair, Electra eSTOL Test, Space Tour No-Go

Also: Aerox 'Cylinder Sentinel', Annual TBM Reunion, Hubble Pause, Utah AAM A combined Spanish-Portuguese aerobatic demo team suffered a fatality at the Beja AirShow, when one of t>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Aviation Prop Masters--Hartzell Composite Props for the KingAir

From 2019 (YouTube Version): Hartzell Propeller Secures STC For King Air Propellers Hartzell Propeller has secured an FAA Type Certificate for a new five-blade carbon fiber propell>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.03.24)

"Starship’s third flight test made tremendous strides towards a future of rapidly reliable reusable rockets. The test completed several exciting firsts, including the first S>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.03.24)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) We hope to promote flying in Utah, and we welcome you to our state. We recognize the inherent hazards and risk involved in ba>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.03.24):Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC