AMA And Other Org's Urge FAA to Make Essential Changes to Remote ID Rule | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Sun, Sep 13, 2020

AMA And Other Org's Urge FAA to Make Essential Changes to Remote ID Rule

“The Proposed Rule Will Make It Nearly Impossible For Everyday Hobbyists To Share The Skies...”

The Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) joined with EAA, and AOPA, and Google’s Project Wing to send a letter this week urging the FAA to make essential changes to the proposed rule for Remote Identification (remote ID) of UAS.

These stakeholders – which represent a cross-section of the model aviation, general aviation, and commercial UAS sectors – share a concern that the current rule is too difficult for everyday hobbyists to comply and alternatives are needed.

“The proposed rule will make it nearly impossible for everyday hobbyists to share the skies,” the letter states. “They will need to incorporate highly automated equipment into home-built models, and implement manufacturing processes comparable to a commercial aircraft. These requirements are infeasible for hobbyists who experiment in their garage, buy material at the local hardware store, and fly in their backyard or the local park.”

The letter describes how, if hobbyists cannot comply with complex requirements of amateur-build requirements, they will be confined to a small number of FAA-recognized “identification areas.” The FAA only anticipates about 2,400 of these sites for the entire U.S. population of 327 million people. The agency has also not proposed any process for renewing or recognizing new areas.

“We urge the FAA to consider alternative approaches that promote safety and security while supporting model aviation,” the letter continues. “For example, hobbyists could notify their planned flight area to the FAA and other observers on the ground via smartphone app. Today, drone operators can fly in controlled airspace around our busiest airports by notifying their planned flight area to the FAA through apps. The FAA should be applauded for digitizing these capabilities in an accessible way. That approach is safe, smart, and sensible, and could apply to remote identification.”

The letter concludes by urging the FAA to find a path forward that allows everyday hobbyists to easily comply with the remote ID rule.

FMI: www.modelaircraft.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.20.24: Van's BK Exit, Bud Anderson, Air Race Classic

Also: ALPA Warns, Aviation Meteorology Reference, Jennifer Homendy Re-Ups, CAF Tampa Bay The court has approved Van's Aircraft's bankruptcy reorganization plans, settling a stressf>[...]

Airborne 05.20.24: Van's BK Exit, Bud Anderson, Air Race Classic

Also: ALPA Warns, Aviation Meteorology Reference, Jennifer Homendy Re-Ups, CAF Tampa Bay The court has approved Van's Aircraft's bankruptcy reorganization plans, settling a stressf>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.18.24): Flameout Pattern

Flameout Pattern An approach normally conducted by a single-engine military aircraft experiencing loss or anticipating loss of engine power or control. The standard overhead approa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.18.24)

Aero Linx: VC-25 - Air Force One The mission of the VC-25 aircraft — Air Force One — is to provide air transport for the president of the United States. The presidentia>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC