Family Of Tesla Engineer Sues Pilot's Estate | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Thu, Aug 19, 2010

Family Of Tesla Engineer Sues Pilot's Estate

Andrew Ingram Was Fatally Injured In East Palo Alto Accident

The family of 31-year-old Andrew Ingram, who was among those killed when a Cessna 310 went down in a residential neighborhood in East Palo Alto, CA, has sued the estate of the pilot, who was also killed in the crash.

The lawsuit names the estate of 56-year-old Douglas Bourn, whom Ingram's family says showed negligence for originating the flight in foggy weather. It also names Air Unique, the company which owned the airplane.

Bourn allegedly had not flown the 310 for 18 months before attempting the flight which struck power lines and then went down in a residential neighborhood moments after departure in fog. The San Jose Mercury News reports that the Ingram's attorney, Frank Pitre, said in a written statement "This plane crash could have been avoided if the owner and operator of the aircraft, Douglas Bourn, demonstrated concern for the safety of his passengers -- instead of blatant disregard for his lack of recent flying experience, poor weather and the condition of his aircraft."

In the legal documents filed San Mateo Superior Court, Ingram's attorney's point to communications between Bourn and ATC, in which Bourn is told twice that he is "not cleared for takeoff" due to the weather. Bourn was told that the tower could not see the runway in the fog, and that any departure was "at your own risk." Bourn reportedly replied "OK, 25 Juillet, rolling."

Bourn, who worked for Tesla Motors along with Ingram and the third person on the aircraft, Brian Finn, was flying himself and his co-workers from Palo Alto to Hawthorne, CA, where the company does some design work.

The suit filed Tuesday does not specify a dollar amount of damages.

FMI: www.sanmateocourt.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC