Ten Years After, What's The Cost of Security? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Sep 14, 2011

Ten Years After, What's The Cost of Security?

Exact Numbers Unclear, But Report Estimates 'Tens Of Billions'

As the 9/11 anniversary approached last week, the Wall Street Journal's Scott McCartney set out to calculate the cost of transportation security. Some of the costs are vague and hard to nail down, but some are clear. In the end, we're spending tens-of-billions of dollars, and still have gaps in our efforts to keep terrorists out of our lives.

Airline passengers pay $2.50 per flight leg, or up to $10 per round trip by airline, but the losses suffered by the airline industry due to passengers opting to skip flying to avoid being groped or scanned is harder to determine. Screening of air freight has added 5-to-8 cents per pound, or about 5 percent, to shipping costs, although that's significantly less than the 45 cents per pound in fuel surcharges which were passed on to customers when oil hit $100 per barrel.

One predicted calamity brought on by screening of cargo, delays of 24-to-36 hours, have never materialized. The bad news: That's due at least in part to the fact that the recession has overall shipping volume well below 2008 levels, so the system has never been tested at full capacity.

The Transportation Security Administration spends $8 billion a year on its army of 52,000 screeners, but the productivity and time lost by travelers delayed by screeners is hard to calculate. TSA is finally starting to experiment with a trusted traveler program which would better focus screening efforts on higher-risk passengers, which may help control the growth in costs to taxpayers.

FMI

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.30.24): Runway Centerline Lighting

Runway Centerline Lighting Flush centerline lights spaced at 50-foot intervals beginning 75 feet from the landing threshold and extending to within 75 feet of the opposite end of t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.30.24)

Aero Linx: Air Force Global Strike Command Air Force Global Strike Command, activated August 7, 2009, is a major command with headquarters at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, i>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC