GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Dec 07, 2016

GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions

No Clear Indication As To What Agency Is Responsible For Protecting Consumers From Malfunctioning Drones

The recent recall by GoPro of its Karma drone has raised questions about what agency, if any, is responsible for protecting the public from such malfunctions.

A story published in Consumer Reports indicates that it is not clear what government agency has jurisdiction for enforcing such a recall. Scott Wolfson, a spokesman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said that "we do not have jurisdiction over drones." And while the FAA regulates how and where drones can be operated, agency spokeswoman Alison Duquette told the publication that the FAA does not certify drones during the manufacturing process. "If a drone manufacturing defect that affects aviation safety were identified, the FAA would first contact the manufacturer to understand the issue and determine the best course of action to address the safety issue," she said.

GoPro spokesman Jeff Brown said that the company contacted both the CPSC and the FAA when they were planning the recall. The CPSC said there was a statutory carve out for aviation, but it would participate if GoPro wished. GoPro declined the offer. The FAA said it supported the company's decision to go ahead with the recall if it thought that was the best course of action, but it would not participate in the recall.

In June, Consumer's Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, identified drones as an "emerging hazard" and urged the CPSC to "not hesitate to get involved even when another agency is [overseeing] a product."

(Image from file)

FMI: http://consumersunion.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC