Rep. Oberstar Sides With NATCA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Thu, Sep 25, 2003

Rep. Oberstar Sides With NATCA

Says Controllers Conceal Mistakes

Representative James Oberstar (D-8-MN) has released the following endorsement of the controllers' union position:

Dear Aviation Subcommittee Colleague:

At tomorrow's [Wednesday's] hearing on contracting out of FAA's air traffic control facilities, the Subcommittee will consider a recent report of DOT's Inspector General (IG), which evaluates data on the safety of existing contract towers compared to towers operated by FAA controllers. I have been doubtful that the data discussed by the IG provides a basis for comparing the safety of the two types of towers.

A major concern is that the only data evaluated by the IG was "operational errors;" that is, instances which controllers permit aircraft to get closer than established standards for aircraft separation. The only way that this data becomes available is for the controller who makes the error to report it. There is no basis for determining whether contract towers or FAA towers report all the errors, or whether one type of tower may be more inclined to under-report than the other type. This raises serious questions as to the usefulness of the data for making comparisons.

Because of my concerns, I asked the General Accounting Office for its opinion on whether comparisons of operational errors among different types of air traffic control facilities can be used to compare their safety. In the attached report, GAO concluded that:

"We identified several potential limitations with FAA's data on operations errors based on our review of issued GAO and DOT reports and applications of best methodological practices."

"Comparisons of operational errors among types of air traffic control facilities, such as FAA-staffed facilities versus contractor-staffed facilities, cannot be used alone to provide valid conclusions about safety. based on standard methodological practices and our understanding of FAA's data."

"The determination of real differences in the rate of operational errors between different types of air traffic control facilities is difficult, and comparisons of operational error rates alone are not sufficient to draw conclusions about the relative safety records of air traffic facilities."

I strongly urge you and your staff to review this GAO report in preparation for tomorrow's hearing.

Sincerely,

James L. Oberstar (above, with TSA boss James Loy, at AOPA forum)
Ranking Democratic Member, COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Sens Lautenberg and Daschle Flip-Flop on 'Privatization' Issue
Then, It Wasn't 'Safety' or 'Politics,' You See; It Was Just a Good Idea

Jeff Gannon, of Talon News, noted that, "[Senator Frank] Lautenberg (D-NJ) was quoted in the Washington Post in 1994, saying, 'The [Clinton] administration's proposal to privatize the air traffic control system is consistent with the desire to bring more efficiency and reform to government and should be reviewed seriously.'" Gannon dug up a 1993 Capitol speech by that same senator: "I strongly endorse the FAA's contract tower program for level 1 (the smallest) control towers. ... The use of contract towers is an example of how we can reduce the costs of Government services and achieve savings over the long run."

You see, in those days, when Lautenberg was endorsing privatization, the idea was part of then-VP Al Gore's 'Reinventing Government' program. Gore's a Democrat; Lautenberg's a Democrat...

Sen. Daschle (D-SD), then the Senate Majority Leader, was full of kudos for Lautenberg at the time: "I would like to compliment the Senator from New Jersey for once again doing a masterful job in providing the Senate with an appropriations bill that recognizes the importance of our transportation systems to the health of our economy and fairly balances the competing demands for improved transportation services throughout the United States."

Gannon correctly points out that now-mega-lobbyist Linda Hall Daschle, the senator's wife, was a Deputy Administrator of the FAA at the time. Now, both senators are threatening to nuke FAA funding if the union's wishes [against privatization] aren't included.

Administrator Blakey pointed out at the hearing Wednesday that 99% of the controllers are former FAA or former military, anyway.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Sierra Space Repositions Dream Chaser for First Mission

With Testing Soon Complete, Launch Preparations Begin in Earnest Sierra Space's Dream Chaser has been put through the wringer at NASA's Glenn Armstrong Test Facility in Ohio, but w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.10.24): Takeoff Roll

Takeoff Roll The process whereby an aircraft is aligned with the runway centerline and the aircraft is moving with the intent to take off. For helicopters, this pertains to the act>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.10.24)

“We’re proud of the hard work that went into receiving this validation, and it will be a welcome relief to our customers in the European Union. We couldn’t be mor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.11.24)

"Aircraft Spruce is pleased to announce the acquisition of the parts distribution operations of Wag-Aero. Wag-Aero was founded in the 1960’s by Dick and Bobbie Wagner in the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.11.24): IDENT Feature

IDENT Feature The special feature in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) equipment. It is used to immediately distinguish one displayed beacon target from other be>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC