Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Wed, Aug 23, 2017

Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation

Paper Says Delays Caused Key Evidence To Be Lost

The editorial board of the East Bay Times newspaper has written a piece in which they accuse the FAA and Air Canada of dragging their feet in the investigation of an incident July 7 at San Francisco International Airport (KSFO). An Air Canada A320 lined up to land on a taxiway where four aircraft were lined up waiting for takeoff, and initiated a go-around below 60 feet of altitude, according to the NTSB's preliminary report.

But the editorial board says that Air Canada and the FAA have slowed the pace of the investigation, which has led to the cockpit voice recorder data to be erased. They also say that the Canadian pilots were never tested for drugs and alcohol, and conclude that it all points to a "bureaucratic cover-up that conveniently protects the federal agency and the airline involved."

According to the editorial, the FAA only required one controller to be on duty at the time that the incident occurred, and that the agency did not notify the NTSB about the incident until more than 24 hours after it happened. That allowed Air Canada to operate the aircraft three more times before the investigation began, and the subsequent flights caused the Cockpit Voice Recorder to overwrite the recordings made during the incident flight multiple times.

The board says Air Canada refuses to answer questions about the investigation, the FAA will not explain why it took more than a day to report the incident, and the NTSB says that federal rules do not require such notification because there was no actual collision.

The board says that former NTSB chairman Jim Hall told a reporter for the paper that the investigation should have begun immediately, due to the potential for disaster caused by the mistake.

(NTSB image from file)

FMI: Full Editorial

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC