GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Wed, Dec 07, 2016

GoPro Karma Recall Raises Regulatory Questions

No Clear Indication As To What Agency Is Responsible For Protecting Consumers From Malfunctioning Drones

The recent recall by GoPro of its Karma drone has raised questions about what agency, if any, is responsible for protecting the public from such malfunctions.

A story published in Consumer Reports indicates that it is not clear what government agency has jurisdiction for enforcing such a recall. Scott Wolfson, a spokesman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) said that "we do not have jurisdiction over drones." And while the FAA regulates how and where drones can be operated, agency spokeswoman Alison Duquette told the publication that the FAA does not certify drones during the manufacturing process. "If a drone manufacturing defect that affects aviation safety were identified, the FAA would first contact the manufacturer to understand the issue and determine the best course of action to address the safety issue," she said.

GoPro spokesman Jeff Brown said that the company contacted both the CPSC and the FAA when they were planning the recall. The CPSC said there was a statutory carve out for aviation, but it would participate if GoPro wished. GoPro declined the offer. The FAA said it supported the company's decision to go ahead with the recall if it thought that was the best course of action, but it would not participate in the recall.

In June, Consumer's Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, identified drones as an "emerging hazard" and urged the CPSC to "not hesitate to get involved even when another agency is [overseeing] a product."

(Image from file)

FMI: http://consumersunion.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.16.24): Instrument Runway

Instrument Runway A runway equipped with electronic and visual navigation aids for which a precision or nonprecision approach procedure having straight-in landing minimums has been>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.16.24)

Aero Linx: Alaska Airmen's Association The Alaska Airmen's Association includes over 2,000 members—we are one of the largest General Aviation communities in the country. We s>[...]

Airborne 05.15.24: Ghost Sq MidAir, B-2 Junked, Dream Chaser Readies

Also: Flt School Security, G600 Steep-Approach, Honduran Aid, PW545D Cert Two aircraft performing at the Fort Lauderdale Air Show clipped wings during a routine last Sunday, spooki>[...]

Airborne 05.10.24: Icon Auction, Drunk MedEvac Pilot, Bell ALFA

Also: SkyReach Parts Support, Piper Service Ctr, Airliner Near-Miss, Airshow London The Judge overseeing Icon's convoluted Chapter 11 process has approved $9 million in Chapter 11 >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.16.24: PRA Runway, Wag-Aero Sold, Young Eagles

Also: Paramotor Champ's, Electric Ultralight, ICON BK Update, Burt Rutan at Oshkosh! The Popular Rotorcraft Association is reaching out for help in rebuilding their private runway >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC