NTSB Releases Preliminary Report In Benoist Replica Seaplane Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Sat, Aug 10, 2013

NTSB Releases Preliminary Report In Benoist Replica Seaplane Accident

Pilot Said He 'Could Not Control The Landing'

The pilot of a replica Benoist Type XIV seaplane told NTSB investigators that he was "not able to control the airplane" during its first flight after being issued an airworthiness certificate. The pilot was not injured in the accident.

According to the NTSB's preliminary report, On July 16, 2013, at 1130 central daylight time, the experimental amateur-built Marino model Benoist Type XIV seaplane, N613LD, was substantially damaged when it impacted water shortly after takeoff from Superior Bay near Duluth, Minnesota. The private pilot was not injured. The seaplane was registered to and operated by Duluth Aviation Institute, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, without a flight plan. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight test that departed Sky Harbor Airport (KDYT), Duluth, Minnesota, about 1110.

The accident occurred during the first flight since the seaplane was issued an experimental airworthiness certificate on June 27, 2013. The seaplane was a replica of a 100 year old design. The pilot reported that the seaplane had accumulated 3.7 hours of water operations before he attempted the accident flight. Additionally, he stated that there were no anomalies with the seaplane during the two water taxi runs that were completed immediately before the accident takeoff. He reported that his test plan was to achieve liftoff and then fly 1-2 feet above the water for a couple hundred yards before landing.

The pilot stated that during the takeoff run he increased engine power, from 3,000 rpm to 4,000 rpm, after which the seaplane became airborne within a few seconds and unexpectedly entered a high climb angle. He made a pitch reduction, but the seaplane responded quicker than he expected and a pitch increase was subsequently required to avoid a collision with the water. The seaplane ultimately climbed to about 30 feet above the water before the pilot initiated a descent for a landing. The pilot reported that he “could not control the landing” and that the seaplane impacted the water in a nose low and right wing low attitude. The forward fuselage and wings sustained substantial damage during the impact. The pilot extricated himself from the wreckage and was recovered by his support crew following in a chase boat. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical anomalies with the seaplane during the accident flight. In addition, he noted that his overall lack of flight experience in the seaplane contributed to the accident.

At 1134, the KDYT automated surface observing system reported the following weather conditions: wind 090 degrees true at 3 knots, visibility 10 miles, sky clear, temperature 19 degrees Celsius, dew point 17 degrees Celsius, altimeter setting 30.16 inches of mercury.

(Benoist Type XIV pictured in 1914 photograph)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC