U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Dec 24, 2011

U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision

Officials Say They Have 'Strong Legal Objections'

A State Department official says that the U.S. Government is strongly opposed to the imposition of a European emissions cap-and-trade scheme on U.S. flagged airliners. The EU's highest court affirmed the Union's right to impose the fees in a decision handed down Wednesday.

"We continue to have strong legal and policy objections to the inclusion of flights by non-EU air carriers in the EU ETS," said Krishna R. Urs, deputy assistant secretary for transportation affairs at the U.S. State Department. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned of possible reprisals before the ruling was made public.

Reuters reports that China's state-run news agency Xinhua warned of a possible trade war if the tax is imposed, though that country's foreign ministry did not take that hard-line stance. Various non-European airline associations have also vehemently opposed the measure, and have released statements reiterating the opposition in the days following the ruling.

European officials say that the threats of trade wars or sanctions are "rhetoric," but some non-European analysts say that some kind of retaliation, even if it is minor, is to be expected to show that the U.S. disapproves of the tax. U.S.-flagged carriers have said they will grudgingly pay the tax if it comes to that, though they are considering their legal options. Legislation is still pending in Congress that would make it illegal for U.S. airlines to comply with the law, which could place the companies in a no-win situation.

The EU has vowed to "hold firm" on the fee, and points out that if U.S. and other airlines are taking "equivalent measures" then no tax will be imposed.

FMI: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC