Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Dec 01, 2016

Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths

Recommends Higher Approach Altitudes And Procedural Changes

After four months of work, the Select Committee on South Bay Arrivals has recommended some changes to the new approach corridors over Palo Alto, Mountain View, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, and other communities south of San Francisco International Airport (KSFO).

The Palo Alto Weekly newspaper reports that the committee produced a 44-page report that includes ideas ranging from a change in nighttime flight hours to changing routes aircraft use on approach to the airport.

The flight paths became an issue when after the FAA implemented NextGen approach procedures into KSFO in 2015 which took aircraft over communities that had not previously seen a lot of air traffic. The most controversial route shifted a flight path three miles to the east, and was intended for Optimal Profile Descent under NextGen. But there was a conflict with other restricted airspace around KSFO, and pilots were required to carry power and then use "speed braking" to reduce airspeed on approach, which created more noise. The route, known as SERFR, generated more than a million complaints, according to the committee's report.

The committee recommended returning that route to the previous Big Sur flight path. However, that recommendation was opposed by members of the committee who live in the towns underneath that flight path. It also recommended that the FAA establish a minimum altitude over the MENLO waypoint of 5,000 feet.

The committee went on to recommend that the FAA should continue to meet with the community leaders after new procedures are implemented to track how effective the changes have been, and should consider developing a new flight path that would take flights over less populated areas.

FMI: Full Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC