FAA Investigates Close Call Over MEM | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, Mar 01, 2008

FAA Investigates Close Call Over MEM

Confusion Over FedEx Flight Numbers Led To Incursion

It's one of the most common areas of potential confusion in the cockpit -- radio transmissions and ATC communications involving two aircraft with similar-sounding tail- or- flight-numbers. Such was case last week at Memphis International Airport, and it led to a close call involving two FedEx aircraft.

The Associated Press reports two FedEx DC-10s -- departing at around the same time from MEM, on parallel runways -- came within 200 feet vertically and 3/4 of a mile horizontally after takeoff February 21, after one of the jets followed instructions intended for the second aircraft.

The flights involved were FedEx 527, and FedEx 257. "The controller didn't recognize the error on read-back," FAA spokeswoman Kathleen Bergen said.

The resulting airspace violation has been listed as a Category A incursion, considered the most serious by the FAA. Large aircraft over Memphis are supposed to keep a distance of at least 1,000 feet vertically and three miles horizontally.

"We had a pilot read-back error, which caused us to have an operational error," Bill Wertz, the FAA's tower supervisor at MEM, told the Memphis Commercial Appeal. "We did our investigation and are providing training for the controller. FedEx has assured us that they are also taking appropriate steps."

As has been the case in past incidents nationwide, the local representative of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association blamed the incident -- and other recent mistakes by controllers at MEM -- on short-staffing, forced overtime, and fatigue.

"Those airplanes were extremely close together and that's just seconds away from the two of them hitting," said Ron Carpenter, NATCA's Facility Representative at Memphis Center.

Bergen disagreed with that assertion. "We have never found fatigue to be an issue in any of the errors that have occurred at Memphis," she said.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.natca.org, www.fedex.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC