Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Mon, Jun 07, 2010

Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students

High Court Determines City Is Not Responsible For Actions Of Contractor

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that the city of Lewiston is immune from a lawsuit stemming from an airplane accident in which three high school students were fatally injured.

The accident occurred in 2006 during a summer camp for students in the Lewiston High School Junior ROTC program. The three students were participating in an orientation flight when it impacted terrain on Barker Mountain, killing the students and the pilot. The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident was pilot error, and another student who had flown with the pilot said he had a history of "showing off" and performing dangerous maneuvers.

Maine Public Broadcasting reports that the families of the students reached settlements with Twin Cities Air Services, which owned the airplane and provided the pilot. But they had also filed a wrongful death suit against the school district and the city, contending that they had knowledge that the situation would be dangerous and did not act on that knowledge.

The city argued that Twin Cities Air Services made the choice of pilot, and that flying the airplanes was the company's responsibility, but a superior court judge ruled last year that the city was not immune from the suit despite a Maine law that does not hold government entities responsible for the actions of independent contractors.

The Main Supreme Judicial Court's 4-3 decision agrees with the city of Lewiston that it is immune under the Tort Claims Act. But in the dissent, three justices said that the immunity should not apply because the city was "using" the airplane when the accident occurred.

FMI: www.courts.state.me.us/maine_courts/supreme/index.shtml

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.24): Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System

Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System ODALS consists of seven omnidirectional flashing lights located in the approach area of a nonprecision runway. Five lights are located on t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.05.24)

"Polaris Dawn, the first of the program’s three human spaceflight missions, is targeted to launch to orbit no earlier than summer 2024. During the five-day mission, the crew >[...]

Airborne 05.06.24: Gone West-Dick Rutan, ICON BK Update, SpaceX EVA Suit

Also: 1800th E-Jet, Uncle Sam Sues For Landing Gear, Embraer Ag Plane, Textron Parts A friend of the family reported that Lt. Col. (Ret.) Richard Glenn Rutan flew west on Friday, M>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.06xx.24)

“Our aircrews are trained and capable of rapidly shifting from operational missions to humanitarian roles. We planned to demonstrate how we, and our BORSTAR partners, respond>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC