AEA Comments On FAA ARC SMS Recommendations | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Aug 10, 2010

AEA Comments On FAA ARC SMS Recommendations

ARC Recommendation Is The First Step In The Rulemaking Process

SUMMARY: The Safety Management Systems Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) published its final report to the FAA regarding suggestions for the implementation of SMS in the United States. 
 
MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS: Overall, the ARC believes the FAA should issue regulations on SMS. However, it was noted that several SMS concepts already are covered by existing regulations to various degrees.

The ARC recommended organizations certificated pursuant to 14 CFR Parts 21, 119, 121, 125, 135, 141, 142 and 145 as listed in the ANPRM should be included with any SMS mandate. The ARC also recommended 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart K operators be included.

There were a significant number of considerations the ARC also recommended, which the FAA must resolve prior to promulgation of any rule, including:

  • Protection of SMS safety information and proprietary data
  • Alignment with ICAO SMS framework and international acceptability
  • Phased promulgation of SMS regulations
  • Phased implementation of SMS requirements
  • Recognize existing systems and processes
  • Recognize existing regulations/requirements
  • Scalability and flexibility
  • Consistency in requirements for holders of multiple certificates
  • Alternative strategies for SMS implementation
  • SMS does not change existing regulatory standards

AEA COMMENTARY: The ARC recommendation is the first step in the rulemaking process, and it is clear the FAA has a lot of work to do before a proposal can be initiated. For example, the cost/benefit analysis required for all rulemaking will be difficult to achieve, as well as the requirement for evaluation of alternative approaches for small businesses to achieve the same outcome. In each of these cases, the federal agency must define a quantifiable problem that alternative solutions can be measured against. To date, the FAA has not identified a quantifiable problem.

The current status of SMS and how the AEA will assist its membership in implementation of whatever the final rule requires will be a topic of discussion at this fall's AEA regional meetings.

FMI: www.aea.net, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC