Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.16.24

Airborne-NextGen-09.17.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.18.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-09.19.24

Airborne-Unlimited-09.20.24

Sat, Mar 13, 2010

Documentary Shows 'Underwear Bomber' Would Not Have Brought Down Plane

Tests Show A330 Fuselage Would Not Have Been Breached

While admitting there are some discrepancies, a documentary produced by the BBC, which aired this week on The Discovery Channel, maintains that the bomb allegedly carried by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would not have been strong enough to bring down the Northwest A330 as it descended into Detroit on December 25th.

In the program "How Safe Are Our Skies," the producers used a PETN device they say was identical to the one allegedly carried by Abdulmutallab, and detonated it inside the fuselage of a decommissioned 747 in a position identical to the one occupied by the alleged bomber. Video of the event shows the outer skin of the aircraft bulging and rippling from the force of the explosion, but it does not open a hole in the side of the airplane. Captain J. Joseph, identified in the documentary as an aviation expert, said the explosion popped a few rivets out of the skin, but there would not have been any explosive decompression of the airplane. "The actual aircraft would have remained intact," he told Discovery News.

The documentary concludes that, had the bombing been successful, the bomber and the person sitting next to him would have been killed, but most passengers and crew would have survived the explosion. Many would have suffered ruptured eardrums from the shock wave created by the blast.

While a decommissioned 747 is not exactly a newer A330, the documentary producers say that works in the test's favor. The composite materials used in the A330 fuselage are stronger than the older aircraft's aluminum skin, and would have withstood the blast better. They also say that, because the attempt came at about 10,000 feet as the airplane was descending to land, the differences in air pressure between the inside of the aircraft and ambient pressure would not have been great enough to be a significant factor.

FMI: www.bbc.co.uk, www.discovery.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (09.17.24): Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts

Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts Portray the aeronautical data which is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. These charts depict the procedures, incl>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (09.17.24)

“Our industry is approaching a 30-year innovation cycle, and we have less than 25 years to decarbonize aviation. We need to develop new methods to get net zero aerospace tech>[...]

Airborne 09.16.24: Bristell Shooting, EAA v FAA, Boeing Strike!

Also: Girls in Aviation Day, B-29 Doc Heads 4 Chino, C-17 Tail Cone Detaches, Bulgaria Airshow Accident One of two private aircraft that launched from Apatity Airport near Murmansk>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: CubCrafters NX Cub-A Stunning Effort To Build The ‘Perfect Cub'

From 2021 (YouTube Version): We Were Blown Away At How Well The Nosewheel Was Adapted To The X Cub Airframe It should not be a secret to any one of you, that with thousands of hour>[...]

Airborne 09.18.24: Boom XB-1 3rd Test, DJI Ban, SubSonex To EAA Museum

Also: Volato Nixed by Honda, New B-21 Bases, A-10 Unit Inactivated, Gogo/Airshare Boom Supersonic announced its demonstrator aircraft XB-1 successfully completed its third test fli>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC