Pilot Fights Embargo Against Jets At Florida's Lantana Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Mon, Dec 19, 2016

Pilot Fights Embargo Against Jets At Florida's Lantana Airport

FAA Says Complaint May Have Merit

Lantana Airport (KLNA) in Florida's Palm Beach County has banned jets for 43 years under an agreement reached in 1973 between the FAA and Palm Beach County that gave the county the authority to ban jets from the airport.

But that may be about to change thanks to a lawsuit filed by a retired Eastern Airlines pilot, who claims the prohibition is discriminatory.

The FAA has been studying the issue for some eight months, according to a report from the Palm Beach Post. While it has not issued a formal ruling, the FAA has said that the embargo "may be unjustly discriminatory and not consistent with the county’s federal obligations."

KLNA, also known as Palm Beach County Air Park, is the only airport in Florida that formally bans jets.

Pilot Errol Forman, 76, claims that the noise concerns that prompted the ban in the 70s are now moot, given advances in jet aircraft and the engines that power them. He filed a formal complaint with the FAA in April, saying the county was violating the conditions of its AIP grants. But after he landed his Citation I/SP at the airport, he was threatened with a second-degree misdemeanor, which carries penalties of up to $500 and 60 days in jail. The FBO also reportedly reminded Forman about the ban. He stopped using the airport in June, according to the report.

On December 6, the FAA sent a letter written by Deandra Brooks, the southern region airport compliance specialist, that said while the agency had had no objections to the proposed ban in 1973, the agency could also find no documentation or analysis that would have led the agency to believe the "discriminatory restriction was just or reasonable." She said it was her conclusion that the ban has "denied a class of aeronautical users the benefits of federal funded improvements" at the airport.

But she also said the burden of proof that the ban is discriminatory is on Forman. If it turns out to be a safety issue, the FAA will have the final say.

The Denver law firm retained by the city in the matter said it will ask the FAA to provide some "clarity on how the county should act until the FAA safety investigation is complete."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC