LASP Opposition Strong At Westchester TSA Forum | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Mon, Jan 12, 2009

LASP Opposition Strong At Westchester TSA Forum

TSA Roadshow Continues To Draw Criticism From Every Side

Another in a series of meetings held by the Transportation Security Administration to listen to public response on the proposed Large Aircraft Security Program was held last week at the Westchester County Airport (HPN) in White Plains, NY.

"The TSA is looking at addressing the risks associated with general aviation," TSA spokesman Michal Morgan said before the meeting. "That includes the use of aircraft as a weapon or as a conveyance mechanism for dangerous materials."

The TSA predicts that expanding its oversight from 650 to over 10,000 operators will cost $196 million a year, with 86 percent of the financial burden to fall on the affected plane owners.

The New York Times reported that during the forum, over 60 pilots, executives, and spokespersons for the GA community expressed their thoughts on the implementation of the proposed regulations - all negative.

Jeff Lee, corporate pilot and president of the Westchester Aviation Association, said, "We've seen in Iraq that a Toyota packed with explosives can be an effective terror tool; the question is what will be the likelihood of that happening? This proposal does not truly enhance the nation's security."

Hapco Farms pilot Sally Pezza said, "I've been flying for this company for 23 years; we fly the same people to the same places. We're solid American citizens. It's so ridiculous, we're speechless."

Hapco has utilized business aircraft for 45 years, saving traveling company executives time and money in the process. But adding up the costs the new regulations would impose, Pezza was uncertain whether maintaining a corporate jet would remain cost-effective.

"It's going to cost me $10,000-plus to get some guy to put this program together and X amount of dollars for FBI fingerprint checks," Pezza said. "Another X for the security audit, X for each passenger to be approved by the TSA for each flight. It's just too much."

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC